rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

UPDATE: What is a Climate Justice Tribunal?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Over the next week I hope to learn more about the idea of a Climate Justice Tribunal.

One of the main aims of the upcoming Peoples World Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth in Cochabamba is to analyze and develop an action plan to advance the establishment of such a tribunal.

As noted in the March 2010 issue of the New Internationalist, "An international climate justice tribunal has already been set up, thanks to a decision of the Fourth Summit of Indigenous Peoples and Nationalities of Abya Yala, Bolivia. The court had its first preliminary hearing on 13-14 October 2009 in Cochabamba."

At this point, the NI article adds, "It's not a tribunal in a legal sense, having no formal legal authority, but seeks rather to create an ethical, moral force that will pressure governments to assume their responsibilities within the framework of equality and climate justice."

A preliminary hearing of this tribunal has already included a claim by "the rural community of Khapi outside La Paz, who depend on glacial melt from Mount Illimani for irrigation. The glaciers are disappearing fast due to global warming and the villagers are accusing the high CO2-producing industrial nations of violating their human rights."

One of the questions being proposed for the People's World Referendum on Climate Change is, "Do you agree with a Climate Justice Tribunal to judge those who destroy Mother Earth?".

This is a question that could be asked of millions of people around the world sometime between now and the COP 16 climate summit in Cancun, Mexico starting on November 29.

As I sit in the Buenos Aires airport waiting to depart to Santa Cruz de la Sierra and then on to Cochabamba, it's very much a proposal that I would like to learn more about.

I also can't help but wonder how Canada, with its unconstrained tar sands emissions and a government that acts as an impediment to much-needed international action, would be judged by such a tribunal.

Brent Patterson, Director of Campaigns and Communications, Council of Canadians


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.