rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

EU wants more, more, more from Canada in controversial trade negotiations

European trade commissioner

So how do you like it, Mr. De Gucht? The Canada-EU trade deal, that is. Not very much, according to news reports of public posturing on both sides of the CETA negotiations.

"What was on the table simply didn't please me, so I didn't make an agreement," said the European trade commissioner (pictured) in Brussels today, as if he were bargaining with a parent over whether or not to eat his peas. In fact, De Gucht was referring to a February 6 ministerial meeting with International Trade Minister Ed Fast that failed to bridge the remaining gaps in the CETA negotiations.

"They (Canada) need to make additional steps and, if not, there will not be an agreement."

Fast's spokesperson Rudy Husny responded, "We continue to appreciate and encourage the EU's high level of ambition, especially on the core issues of importance to Canada."

Neither side has the upper hand. The EU is waving about a potential U.S. free trade deal as a reason for Canada to give way quickly and generously on intellectual property, procurement and dairy imports or watch CETA get pushed aside for more important negotiations. But that's the Commission's problem as much as Harper's. De Gucht needs to finish CETA before a planned U.S.-EU summit in June or it will look like he can't make the compromises the U.S. government is demanding on agriculture (beef, pork, grains) and regulations, which transatlantic free trade could weaken in Europe.

Diagnosis: Another media burp at the end of a four-year trade negotiation that went unnoticed by too many for too long.

Should we care? Not really. The best possible outcome is for De Gucht to stand by his words and walk away from CETA.

What can we do about it? Canada can walk away first!

It's a small thing but why not write the Prime Minister (or send him a tweet @pmharper) asking him, quite simply, to walk away from the Canada-EU trade negotiations. End the dance. This De Gucht character is too fussy and it was a bad deal to begin with.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.