rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Supreme Court's Harkat ruling is a profound injustice

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: Mike Alexander/flickr

The Supreme Court decision Wednesday to uphold the Security Certificate process is devastating news for Mohamed Harkat, his wife Sophie, and his family. The ruling is a serious blow to human rights in Canada and preserves a deeply undemocratic practice.

Despite some reports, the Supreme Court did not rule that Harkat is or has ever been a terrorist. In fact the court didn't even rule that he has committed any crime whatsoever. The Supreme Court only ruled that Security Certificates are a "reasonable" process, despite the fact that they are based on hearsay, innuendo and secret information.

While the Supreme Court has ruled Security Certificates are constitutional in this decision, in 2007 the Supreme Court found them to be unconstitutional. So which are we to believe?

In response to the 2007 ruling on constitutionality, the Harper government added so-called "special advocates" to the Security Certificate process. Special advocates are court-appointed lawyers who supposedly defend the accused in secret hearings. This has not resolved anything and it is an unacceptable process that only perpetuates a two-tiered justice system in Canada.

There is no substitute for a fair trial, which Mohamed Harkat and the Secret Trial Five have been denied for far too long. Special advocates are a far cry from restoring the human rights violated by Security Certificates. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court ruled special advocates to be an adequate way of compensating for a fundamentally flawed process. And in the decision this week, the court has curtailed the already limited powers of special advocates.

International law is clear that people are presumed innocent until proven guilty and have the right to a fair trial. Mohamed Harkat has not had anything resembling a trial at all, let alone a fair one, and is presumed guilty based on information obtained through torture, the originals of which have since been destroyed.

Security Certificates are a form of oppression, a blatant human-rights violation, and have thus far almost solely been used against Arab and Muslim men.

We at the Council of Canadians are unequivocally opposed to the secret trials, deportation to torture, and a two-tiered justice system, which Security Certificates represent. That Security Certificates are allowed to continue sends a very worrying message to the rest of world about where Canada stands on human rights and international law. This must come to an end.

Now is the time for us to raise our voices even louder and ask our government and Members of Parliament: Are you in favour of a law that allows arbitrary detention, the use of secret information, indefinite detention and deportation to torture? Are you in favour of a two-tiered justice system?

A court ruling that upholds a bad law doesn't make it a good law. Security Certificates are still an insult to justice and democracy. The Supreme Court decision today highlights more clearly than ever before, it is time to abolish them entirely.

Parliament has a responsibility to end this injustice. And it's up to all of us to call on our MPs to take action. Please take action now by signing the declaration against Secret Trials at www.harkatstatement.com. 

Photo: Mike Alexander/flickr


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.