rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Liberals veto national pharmacare while more Canadians can't fill their prescriptions

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Yesterday was the first meeting of the Commons Standing Committee on Health to study how Canada might create a national pharmacare program. A national drug plan was first recommended in a the 1964 Royal Commission on Health Services. Today, Canada remains "the only country in the world with a medicare system that excludes prescription drugs as if they are not part of the health-care system."

Roughly 52 years later, after 11 Liberal governments and six Conservative governments, Canadians remain left with a fragmented system and inequitable drug coverage. As it stands, 10 per cent of Canadians have no practical form of ongoing coverage.

As drug prices continue their meteoric rise, approximately one in five Canadians (previous data had shown one in 10), say that "they themselves or someone in their household resorted to saving money this past year by not buying drugs ordered by a doctor or by skimping on doses. That's a prescription for ill health."

At the same time, more than 90 per cent of Canadians support the concept of pharmacare and health economists have shown through studies that, "Canada-wide savings from national pharmacare at between $4 billion and $11 billion per year, depending on how the program is structured."

Reliable research has shown that on a total cost of $27 billion paid for drugs, we pay up to $11 billion more than we would with a national plan. Meanwhile both provincial plans and private insurance plans are struggling under the high prices and cutting back coverage. If done correctly national, comprehensive universal pharmacare coverage is a no-brainer, and the Council of Canadians has joined 300 health professionals and academics in a letter urging the government to support universal pharamacare.

It came as a major disappointment this week that Canada's Health Minister, Jane Philpott, indicated pharmacare is not part of her mandate. It has been reported that the minister believes pharmacare is too costly and she has highlighted it will not be introduced in this Parliament.

"It sounds like it might be expensive and that's one of the reasons we're not in the position where we're about to implement pharmacare," Philpott stated. "There are public drug plans across the country for people who can't afford medication."

It is hard to understand why the minister is ignoring the evidence-based data that shows Canada could improve health outcomes and save costs with a national pharmacare program. While she hinted her government would look at a national formulary, this is a far from universal pharmacare (not to mention concerns over how the pharmaceutical industry could influence the formulary).

During the standing committee, Tanya Potashnik, Director of Policy and Economic Analysis at the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), explained, "By any measure, Canadians spend an inordinate amount on drugs relative to our OECD partners...On average, Canadian prices are 26 per cent higher than the OECD median. Canada spends more per capita and as a percentage of GDP on drugs than most other OECD countries."

There is clearly a problem and people (usually the most vulnerable in our society who do not have the economic and social clout to pressure our government) are falling through the cracks as prices rise. Numerousreports show us that there is a better path that puts the health of Canadians first.

We have a historic opportunity with the negotiations for a new Health Accord to include pharmacare.  This is both feasible and realistic, but it takes political will above all else. The role of Health Canada, the Ministry of Health, and the Health Minister needs to be refocused on providing people the coverage they need and the social programs we all deserve. 

For far too long governments have abandoned the idea of building legacy social programs that will create a better future for everyone.  We hope this government and the health minister find the courage to re-examine their decision and put the well being of Canadians first and ahead of the exorbitant profits of the pharmaceutical industry. Now is the time.

*A sample of the pharmaceutical industry's lobbying of the Minister and Ministry of Health since the Liberal government was sworn in on November 4, 2015.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.