rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

David Suzuki

David Suzuki's picture
Dr. David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author, and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. He is Companion to the Order of Canada and a recipient of UNESCO's Kalinga Prize for science, the United Nations Environment Program medal, the 2009 Right Livelihood Award, and Global 500. Dr. Suzuki is Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver and holds 26 honorary degrees from universities around the world. He is familiar to television audiences as host of the long-running CBC television program The Nature of Things, and to radio audiences as the original host of CBC Radio's Quirks and Quarks, as well as the acclaimed series It's a Matter of Survival and From Naked Ape to Superspecies. His written work includes more than 52 books, 19 of them for children. Dr. Suzuki lives with his wife, Dr. Tara Cullis, and family in Vancouver, B.C.

The baffling response to Arctic climate change impacts

| January 29, 2013
Photo: NASA Goddard Photo and Video

Change the conversation, support rabble.ca today.

The Arctic may seem like a distant place, just as the most extreme consequences of our wasteful use of fossil fuels may appear to be in some distant future. Both are closer than most of us realize.

The Arctic is a focal point for some of the most profound impacts of climate change. One of the world's top ice experts, Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University, calls the situation a "global disaster," suggesting ice is disappearing faster than predicted and could be gone within as few as four years.

"The main cause is simply global warming: as the climate has warmed there has been less ice growth during the winter and more ice melt during the summer," he told the U.K.'s Guardian.

Over the past 30 years, permanent Arctic sea ice has shrunk to half its previous area and thickness. As it diminishes, global warming accelerates. This is due to a number of factors, including release of the potent greenhouse gas methane trapped under nearby permafrost, and because ice reflects the sun’s energy whereas oceans absorb it.

With all we know about climate change and what’s happening in the Arctic, you'd think our leaders would be marshalling resources to at least slow it down. Instead, industry and governments are eyeing new opportunities to mine Arctic fossil fuels. Factoring in threats to the numerous species of Arctic creatures -- including fish, seabirds, marine mammals such as whales and seals, and polar bears -- makes such an approach even more incomprehensible.  

Royal Dutch Shell has been preparing to drill in the Arctic, spending $4.5 billion on operations and lease purchases. But its record shows how risky this is. First, a spill containment dome failed a routine safety test and was crushed by underwater pressure. More recently, a drilling rig, which was being towed to Seattle so Shell could avoid paying some Alaskan taxes, broke free during a storm and ran aground on an island in the Gulf of Alaska. The disastrous BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 showed how dangerous ocean drilling can be even in relatively calm waters and how bogus the claims of the industry are that it can contain or even clean up a spill.

Responding to climate change and vanishing Arctic ice by gearing up to drill for the stuff at the root of the problem is insane. Unfortunately, many fossil fuel companies and governments are engaged in a mad rush to get as much oil and gas out of the ground -- no matter how difficult -- while there's still a market. The ever-increasing devastation of climate change means we will eventually have to leave much of it where it is -- or at the very least, substantially slow the pace of extraction and use the resource more wisely -- if we want to survive and be healthy as a species.

In Ecuador, knowing that exploiting the country's massive oil reserves will fuel climate change and cause massive environmental destruction in one of the world's most biologically diverse rainforests, leaders are taking a different approach. The government plans to leave oil fields in Yasuni National Park untouched if other countries help compensate for some of the lost revenue. So far only about $300 million has been raised toward the $3.6 billion over 13 years that the government believes would make up for half the oil’s value, but the idea is gaining momentum.

The Guardian notes the money won't go to government but will be "held in trust funds and administered by the UN Development Programme working with a board made up of indigenous peoples, local communities, academics and others."

Ivonne Baki, head of the negotiating committee of the Yasuní-Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputini, told the Guardian Ecuador does not want to become overly dependent on oil. “Oil countries are cursed,” she said. "Developing countries depend on it so much that they do not develop anything else. It breeds corruption and the poor pay the price."

With Arctic ice melting, Australia on fire and increasing droughts, floods and extreme weather throughout the world, it's past time to get serious about global warming. It remains to be seen if a plan like Ecuador's will work, but surely a developed country like Canada can at least learn that wastefully exploiting precious resources as quickly as possible isn’t the only option.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Communications Manager Ian Hanington.

Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

Photo: NASA Goddard Photo and Video



MemMime69, you would have to ignore mountains for evidence to make that case. You'd have to ignore mountains of evidence obtained by rocket scientists owrkign for the US Air Force and Navy too.

I'm certain you wouldn't take the reverse deal.

For instance, I'm sure you wouldn't volunteer to spend the rest of your days in Guantanamo Bay for helping to destroy the USA, if we continue to see crop devastating climate records being broken.

So don't ask such things, if you're not willing to do the same in your fight. We may be scaring children, but your side is working to get them killed.

Using the effect of a serious problem as an opportunity to create more wealth by adding to the cause of that problem is it's own special kind of madness; a man-made reflection of the feedback loop created by the replacement of heat reflecting ice with heat absorbing water. Thanks to David for doing what he can to bring attention to this.

Meme Mine, if you're not a troll and actually believe what you say, it's past time to step away from the noise the fossil fuel industry funded climate deniers make and consider some other sources of information. To give you one example, the Koch brothers—backers of climate skeptic groups—funded a prominant skeptic to review the science behind climate change. His conclusion was that it's happening faster than many models suggested and is clearly the result of human activities.

Elmo, articles like this are one way that people in the know use to motivate the general population to work to right our flawed system and challenge each of the many issues facing us, which, combined are the cancer you refer to. The problems confronting us are multifaceted and every facet, like this one, needs to be addressed.

Yeah whatever mememine69 - no CPC trolls here please

read this and learn http://www.ucsusa.org/ssi/climate-change/scientific-consensus-on.html



The Problem is called capitalism and neo-liberal democracy David.  The system doesn't work.  Stoping the exploration of oil in the Arctic is like using a band aid to fight cancer.  Pointless.


 It’s been 27 years of CO2 climate crisis research so are you willing to be criminally charged with uttering your CO2 death threats to billions of helpless children if climate change crisis can be successfully proven to be exaggerated by an agreed upon format of proof?

 We can’t' love a planet with fear.

Note: Declaring that a little tiny catastrophic climate crisis is even possible outside of Harry Potter movies would make you morally incompetent.

Login or register to post comments