rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Will he resign? Peter MacKay's 'very bad day' gets worse

The Peter MacKay resignation watch is now officially on in Ottawa. Or at least it should be.

Wednesday was already shaping up to be, as the Globe and Mail put it, 'Peter MacKay's very bad day,' with he and Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon scheduled to appear before the special parliamentary committee on Afghanistan. But things went from bad to worse for MacKay with news that the country's top military commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Walter Natynczyk, had made a 180-degree reversal. CTV news reports:

"The move is akin to a political thundercloud breaking over the Conservative party...

During a hastily-called news conference, Gen. Walter Natynczyk said he received new information Wednesday about an incident in June 2006 when an Afghan detainee was transferred to Afghan police, then beaten. One day earlier he testified that the man had only been questioned by Canadian troops, not detained.

The change in stance contradicts the Conservative government's position that there is no evidence Canadian-captured detainees were being abused prior to a new transfer agreement in 2007.

It also contradicts what Natynczyk has been saying since May 2007 about the incident.

Natynczyk said he received the field report on the actual incident only Wednesday and decided to hold a news conference as soon as the information was in his possession, in order to correct his earlier statements.

'Yesterday, just like in May '07. I provided the best information that was available to me,' he told reporters. 'And the moment I saw this report this morning, I realized it was wrong, or the information I provided yesterday was incorrect, and I'm responsible for that.'

Natynczyk said he will be looking into why it took so long before the correct information arrived on his desk."

Make that at least two resignations that should result from this torture scandal. (For now, though, the General's reversal puts MacKay in the political opposition's crosshairs. But at least your dog will always remain loyal, right Peter?)

Heading into 2010, a new parliamentary debate about Canada's role in the occupation of Afghanistan is urgently needed. In addition to what we now know about the Harper government's complicity in torture, a lot has happened since the March 2008 Conservative-Liberal extension of the deployment.

In the last couple months alone, we have seen a blatantly fraudulent "re-election" of the Karzai regime, revelations that the corrupt President's brother, Wali Karzai -- the most powerful man in Kandahar Province -- has been on the CIA payroll for years, and now a massive escalation of the war by the Obama administration. Perhaps the real scandal is that none of these outrages has sparked a serious, wide-ranging debate about this country's participation in the NATO occupation.

 

Update: The Globe and Mail reports, of Prime Minister Harper in Question Period, "Not once did he mention or say a kind word about his Defence Minister." This in response to calls from all three opposition parties for MacKay's resignation. It looks like Harper's getting ready to throw his Defence Minister under the bus. But especially under this control freak/micro-managing regime of Harper, the real responsibility for the obfuscation and cover-up of this torture scandal lies with the PMO.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.