Alberta Diary

djclimenhaga's picture

David Climenhaga, author of the Alberta Diary blog, is a journalist, author, journalism teacher, poet and trade union communicator who has worked in senior writing and editing positions with the Toronto Globe and Mail and the Calgary Herald. His 1995 book, A Poke in the Public Eye, explores the relationships among Canadian journalists, public relations people and politicians. He left journalism after the strike at the Calgary Herald in 1999 and 2000 to work for the trade union movement. Alberta Diary focuses on Alberta politics and social issues.

Sun Media's inappropriate obsession with Calgary Mayor's religion needs to stop

| January 3, 2012
Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi

Demagoguery is not an accusation that stings very much nowadays. Almost anyone can be accused of being a demagogue for saying almost anything, and one's inclination is merely to shrug it off with a snort.

Still, a reasonable person could conclude from the evidence that when Sun Media columnist Ezra Levant wrote his New Year's Eve column about Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi, he risked arousing the emotions, passions and prejudices of some of the people of that city, which is a workable definition of demagoguery.

In his column, Levant tendentiously and unsuccessfully tries to build a case that Mayor Nenshi, whom he repeatedly (four times in approximately 650 words) identifies as a Muslim, is guilty of anti-Christian bigotry.

Levant's logic, if I understand it correctly, proceeds from the fact that Nenshi is a Muslim, to the fact that during Nenshi's tenure in office Occupy Calgary protesters were allowed for a time to camp in the nearby Olympic Plaza, to the fact that a group of evangelical Christians were asked not to conduct a public service without permission inside Calgary's Civic Building, and, when they didn't co-operate and move on, their leader was apparently arrested.

Ergo, Levant preposterously concludes, "the Muslim mayor thinks religious tolerance is a one-way street -- a point he made again brutally this Christmas."

Regardless of Levant's very colourful language, it is clear taken directly from his own account -- if one actually takes the trouble to read it carefully -- that there was no brutality, that the evangelical pastor who tried to conduct a private service within the Civic Building has broken Calgary's civic bylaws more than 70 times over the past six years, and that Mayor Nenshi wasn't the mayor of Calgary when the city cracked down on the earlier offences, many of which involved the volume of the preacher's amplification system.

It is also important to note that in some of this particular pastor's previous tangles with the law, his Charter rights to free expression were violated. However, having established this in the courts -- and presumably therefore now being free to preach his Gospel message out of doors at a legal decibel level -- this individual took his message to a venue where he could be confident he would generate more publicity by again coming into conflict with the law.

Advertising

Notwithstanding this qualification, Levant clearly went way over the top when he suggested Mayor Nenshi has been personally conducting a campaign against this group, or against Christians generally, or that when Christians turn up at City Hall the mayor "sends in the boys with the billy clubs." In addition, the implication that Nenshi is doing this because he is not a Christian, which is a very reasonable interpretation of Levant's argument, is outrageous, as is calling Mayor Nenshi a bigot.

Moreover, the author is taking a gratuitous cheap shot when he observes as an aside that the mayor once lived in his mother's basement -- something I would bet is true of most of us, even some of us who have now paid property taxes for decades. Indeed, even me.

It's not at all clear whether "the boys with the billy clubs" had their billy clubs with them, or were all boys, since there appears from a cursory Google search to have been very little coverage of this event by legitimate news media. Although from that, it's safe to conclude that if the boys did bring their billy clubs, they obviously didn't use them.

On a personal note, I must tell readers that I covered Calgary City Hall for several years for the Calgary Herald. And while there's been a lot of water under the bridge since then, I think it is extremely unlikely that Mayor Nenshi called the police himself, or even knew the police had been called. In fact, I'd bet you a shiny new Twoonie that if Nenshi had known about it, he would have asked the city's security staff to just let the preacher preach.

Be that as it may, if I had been the security supervisor on duty that night and a group of people intentionally created a disturbance inside the Civic Building, I would have called the police too.

This may lead someone like Levant to conclude that I'm a self-hating Christian, but as some readers of his columns may not be aware, there have actually been some fairly deep divisions within Christianity for a number of years that, thankfully, don't seem to arouse quite as much passion nowadays as they once did. So it is possible to think another Christian is behaving inappropriately without hating yourself or questioning your faith -- which, within the broad Christian tradition, can come in a lot of different variations.

Regardless, toward the end of his column, Levant comes to what I suspect is his real motive in writing this drivel: Nenshi is a left-wing mayor. That's not new -- Calgary's last four mayors have been Liberal, as are most of its city councillors.

Well, not all of us would agree that Nenshi is particularly left wing, but he is obviously too left wing for Levant's well-known right-wing tastes.

By the way, if we accept Levant's claim about the last four mayors (Nenshi is identified with the Alberta Party, which is pretty liberal, and I can't find any affiliation information about one of the four), and if we count Ralph Klein as a Liberal as well (the party he was identified with when he ran for mayor), then seven of the last 10 Calgary mayors were Liberals. So Levant is right about this at least: there is a clear pattern, though not necessarily a negative one from Calgary's perspective.

But by going from his complaint about the tendency toward liberality of Calgary's mayors and voters to his completely unsupportable conclusion that "the Muslim mayor thinks religious tolerance is a one-way street," Levant risking inflaming religious prejudice that may exist within Calgary's population to achieve his political goals.

Whatever this author's intention was, that is clearly a danger here. If Sun Media's editors pay attention to what their columnists write, they were irresponsible to run this particular piece. If they do not, they are doubly irresponsible, and need to start paying attention.

Regardless, Sun Media's inappropriate obsession with Mayor Nenshi's religion clearly needs to stop.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

embedded_video

Comments

What Ezra Levant failed to mention in his article is that the same pastor's church has had its tax free status revoked by the Federal Government because of its political activism.

Why doesn't Ezra Levant fault the Harper government for its anti-Christian stance?

But that wouldn't fit his anti-Muslim agenda, of course.

How about simply pointing out that Nenshi is a Bronconnier-style incompetent, liar, and crook, working for the financial backers of his campaign?

*Tried to force a blanket R2 rezoning plan on Calgary communities, as a prelude for 'cutting red tape' (i.e., rezoning for higher density, without requiring community imput) desired by condo developers.

*Attacked opponents of his R2 plan as 'flat-earthers.'

*Accepted campaign finding from slumlords and property holding companies operating under numbered corporate entities.

*A proponent of the Calgary Regional Partnership, which is intended to curb local, democratic input on development.

http://nocalgaryveto.wordpress.com/

*Had the Students' Union of his Alma Mater spend $40,000 on a push-poll, contracted to a campaign donor (Zinc Research), on secondary suites.

*Went on a junket, to Toronto, funded by a City contractor.

*Refused to "go down a rabbit hole" and allow investigation of Druh Farrell's LaCaille Group/Louise Station deal; vehemently opposed a Provincial audit of the same.

*Pretended he was unaware of controversial issues in his City, that were approved through his office, like a hasty and bizzarely-timed addition of bike-only lanes (in the middle of a snowstorm), which took out an entire lane of traffic on a major artery.

*Refused to investigate huge overruns, dubious contracting, and mismanagement at the City: the 16th Avenue widening, the 'Peace Bridge,' questionable land deals (including ones which enriched the former Mayor), Enmax, etc.

*Has refused to provide detailed financials for his airport tunnel project--now estimated to cost over $400M, and with both questionable utility and serious liabilities for the City.

*Pushed nickel-&-dime cuts to essential services (Police, Fire, snow removal), but advocates throwing hundreds of millions away on the above.

*Had the City absorb a Provincial tax (education portion) that should have gone to tax relief for Calgarians.

*Advocates the so-called 'Penny Tax,' endorsed by the Chamber of Commerce, which would be a regressive tax designed to fund porkbarrel projects.

*Issues with his personal conduct, details of which can be gleaned by speaking to former colleagues at Mount Royal University.

'Barney' has limboed over the very low bar Dave Bronconnier set, and it's been barely a year. Plenty to criticise, without mentioning His Purpleness' religion.

I don't think Ezra Levant is driven by political partisanship on this one any more than the "Dirty Oil" campaign. Like the German guy with the little moustache, Levant is trying to provoke violence against the racially-impure. Remember, the guy with the little moustache started off the same way: a small group of fanatics who were written off as a small group of fanatics. Don't underestimate the likes of Ezra Levant and Tom Flanagan. They may belong to a small, insular group of right-wing extremists, but they are backed by big money and power. Alberta is a hot-bed of American-style bigotry and racism imported from Texas and is the shame of Canada.

Harper is Canada's Chamberlain.

But there is a way to defeat the beast. Christy Clark says the west coast of BC belongs to Alberta. Well, by the same token, the Alberta oil sands belong to all of us. Canadians are getting gouged at the gas pumps and it's time we all stood in solidarty for a National Energy Program. Nine provinces versus one. Alberta doesn't stand a chance.

Thank you Ezra Levant for making an unpalatable political concept palatable.

Login or register to post comments