rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Does advertising plagiarism suggest Harper government's running on intellectual fumes?

Plagiarized Tory Ad

If political ads were popular songs, the Manitoba NDP would probably be getting ready to sue the Harper Conservatives about now for copyright infringement.

They'd have a great case.

Thankfully for the Conservatives, TV ads aren't songs, and nor are they likely to be as long as royalties are measured in seats in the House of Commons or a provincial legislature instead of dollars and cents.

So the Harperites' spectacular recent act of political plagiarism, in which they cribbed the story line and most of the text of a 2011 Manitoba ad cooked up by an ad agency long associated with NDP causes, is unlikely to do more than create a few ripples of laughter among the political cognoscenti.

Just the same, the Tory rip-off of NOW Group Communications' 2011 job interview ad, wherein an "employer panel" of citizens discusses a "job applicant" who happens to be a Conservative politician from Manitoba, truly does suggest our "strong, stable majority Conservative government" is now running on intellectual fumes.

The effect of viewing the two 30-second spots one after the other -- the pathetic 2015 Harper version of the ad changes the name of the politician in question to Justin Trudeau and alters the punch line from "nice suit, though," to "nice hair," and… uh… that's about it -- is hilarious.

NOW Group was somewhat gracious, headlining their blog post about the appropriation "Deeply flattered, Mr. Harper. Really."

"Whether the Conservative ad will be as effective is another question," the author of the NOW post observed, however. "We believe every campaign is unique, with its own challenges and opportunities. Copying even a highly successful ad (cough, blush) from a previous election isn't necessarily a smart approach."

The problem, as NOW pointed out, is that even if the Tories got it right that Mr. Trudeau isn't ready to run things, someone else is -- to wit, NDP Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair.

Now that the federal NDP seems suddenly to be on something of a roll in the polls -- perhaps related to the fact we now have a "strong, stable NDP government in Alberta," of all places, which we've been taught since we were toddlers was a Conservative preserve -- the Harper government has a problem that this ad may exacerbate.

It's all very well to play both ends against the middle when you have two weak opponents -- this worked for the Liberals under Jean Chretien and it's been working for the Cons under Stephen Harper.

But as any student of history knows, it's always a problem when you find yourself fighting a war on two fronts.

Unfortunately, the rules of modern Canadian political debate preclude mention of the obvious example, but you know who we have in mind.

That's the situation the Harper government now finds itself in, and this small act of thievery may not help at all if its impact is to drive progressive voters to the party led by Mr. Mulcair, who clearly has what it takes to be prime minister.

I have a theory of my own, that if you attack the stronger of your opponents, voters will accept that as reasonable, but if you attack them both, they may start to think you’re as crazy as an outhouse-residing rodent.

So that really leaves us with only one question: Whose ad will the Tories steal to attack Mr. Mulcair? This guy's?

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.