rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Fact check: Harper claims new tax credit will help 'Canada's most vulnerable seniors'

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Image: Flickr/pmwebphotos

Want to see an election campaign fact rich and spin poor? Chip in to keep our fact check blog up to date.

The claim: Stephen Harper says his new single seniors tax credit is an "affordable and fair commitment that targets Canada's most vulnerable seniors." Is this true?

Stephen Harper announced that if re-elected, his government would give seniors who are single, widowed or divorced an extra $300 per year through the expansion of the Pension Income Credit. This tax credit currently gives married seniors up to $2000 in income that can be sheltered from tax, which equals up to $600 per couple. The Pension Income Credit currently costs $1.1 billion.

None of the money that can be used to access the tax credit can come from the Canadian Pension Plan (CPP) or Old Age Securiity (OAS) payments. Seniors must have an additional source of private pension money to be able to get the extra money.

In 2008, average income for men, aged 65 and older, was $38,100. Women earn just 65 per cent of that: $24,000.

David MacDonald, economist for the CCPA, says that in order for single seniors to benefit from the extended tax credit, they would have to have had an average income of $42,000 in 2010. "This is certainly not going to help the most vulnerable seniors," he said, and added that 3 million seniors have no private pension and will receive nothing. They represent a little under half of all seniors in Canada.

Harper's record for helping seniors has been dismal. Under his leadership, the retirement age was raised from 65 years to 67 and the Canada Health Accord was not renewed. The Conservatives voted against a national dementia strategy. They also refused to open the market to generic pharmaceutical drugs, increasing costs for Canadians to up to $1.6 billion per year.

More and more seniors are living in poverty. And, as provinces seek to balance budgets by cutting healthcare to the bone, user fees are often introduced to pay for services. Like in British Columbia, where some old age homes have announced a new $300 fee for residents to pay if they need to use a wheelchair. Or, ambulance fees, where one trip to the hospital could wipe out any benefit that a senior might gain from such a tax credit. 

$300 doesn't go very far. It can mean an additional six hours of seeing a nurse in your home, or 15 hours of care from a personal service worker.

This tax credit will help some seniors. But if Harper actually cares about helping the most vulnerable, spending nearly $400 million annually to help middle-income seniors is probably not the wisest use of money. 

Verdict:


 

Want to see an election campaign fact rich and spin poor? Chip in to keep our fact check blog up to date.

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.