rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Gerry Caplan's blog

gerry caplan's picture
Gerald Caplan has an MA in Canadian history and a Ph.D. in African history from the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London. He is an author, teacher, media commentator, and social and political activist with a lifelong commitment to African development. He is preoccupied with genocide and genocide prevention, particularly the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, about which he has frequently written. He has been a consultant on African development issues to many United Nations agencies as well as to the African Union. His latest book is called The Betrayal of Africa. He writes a weekly online column for the Globe and Mail.

Justin Trudeau gets a hand from media's star treatment

| October 15, 2012

Although it's not often acknowledged within the party, many New Democrats are worried sick about Justin Trudeau. They should be. The NDP can't win power without attracting a substantial new group of progressive Canadians who previously voted Liberal. Yet these are exactly the people who might find Mr. Trudeau appealing enough to keep them in the Liberal camp. Nor do party strategists have much of a clue how to counter this first flush of incipient Justinmania.

New Democrats feel hard done by, and no wonder. On the basis of precious little, much of the media has been lavishing star treatment on Mr. Trudeau. He receives uncritical front page coverage for doing and saying nothing. Maclean's magazine devoted a good part of last week's issue to singing Mr. Trudeau's praises, treating old pals as credible sources. Stories without a soupcon of news are often accompanied by photos of him and family that any politician would die for.

And yet, when you search for the beef beneath the sizzle, you find a strange phenomenon. It's tempting to parody or satirize the message that Mr. Trudeau has articulated so far, until you realize that no one parodies him better than he does himself. Since every one in Canada knows he's been criticized for being a featherweight, you'd have thought he’d immediately set out to reveal his true gravitas.

Yet what Mr. Trudeau has so far offered Canadians is something rare in the Hobbesian world of politics. What he has offered is love. He seems to think that all you really need is love. Mr. Trudeau bubbles over with love. As he announced at his campaign kick-off, "I love Montreal. I love Quebec. And I am in love with Canada." Jack Layton told us that love is better than anger. But for politicians, love without a serious program is mere mush.

Nor does the love stop with Mr. Trudeau. Describing her husband at the launch of his leadership campaign, Sophie Grégoire called him "The man I love" and made it clear she was selflessly donating him to Canada. Yes, it meant a "sacrifice" for her family, but it was for a "noble cause." Canada, it seems, needs Mr. Trudeau even more than she and the kids do.

This was quite an endorsement of a man who so far in life has moved from snowboarding instructor to private school teacher to third-party backbencher. But his real destiny is now finally clear. You might even think he was entitled to it.

Mr. Trudeau agreed. As he put it to Maclean's: "Can I actually make a difference? Can I get people to believe in politics once more? Can I get people to accept more complex answers to complex questions? I know I can. I know that’s what I do very well. Why am I doing this? Because I can, not because I want to. Because I must."

He must. He has discovered his calling, his entitlement.

When asked by The Globe's Jane Taber to describe his big weaknesses, he finally came up with this: "Sometimes I'm impulsive about the things I say. I try to answer the questions that are asked … Has it got me in trouble? Yes. Will it get me in trouble? Yes." Like his wife, he sees in himself remarkably few flaws.

Mr. Trudeau now matters a great deal, at least to much of the media. Yet when they cover the full panoply of complex questions asked and answered, one finds there is no there there.

Listen as he tries to inspire his audience, asking them for help "because this road will be one long, Canadian highway. We will have ups and downs. Breathtaking vistas and a few boring stretches. And with winter coming, icy patches. But we will match the size of this challenge with hard, honest work."

Listen as he offers his bold new vision and solid new ideas. "We need to learn what we have forgotten. That the key to growth, to opportunity, to progress, is a thriving middle class.” And jobs are important too, he doesn’t fail to add. How has everyone else blinded themselves to these complex truths?

Mr. Trudeau boldly challenges his listeners: "Think about it for a moment: when was the last time you had a leader you actually trusted? And not just the nebulous ‘trust to govern competently,' but actually trusted, the way you trust a friend to pick up your kids from school, or a neighbor to keep your extra front door key? Real trust? That’s a respect that has to be earned, step by step."

While Thomas Mulcair, once briefly the new boy on the block, immerses himself in crucial and controversial issues and (one hopes) pursues serious new policy initiatives, determined to make the NDP a credible choice for government, Mr. Trudeau proffers self-parodying, sophomoric piffle.

Is this good enough for the Liberal Party? Is it good enough, as the NDP fears, for liberal Canadians? Is it enough for the media to continue peddling? So far, it seems it is.


This article was first published in the Globe and Mail.



This is an excellent piece that finally acknowledges the elephant in the room. Good for you, Mr. Caplan, for saying what a lot of our fellow New Democrats would prefer left unsaid. Certainly as far as the media goes, your fear is entirely justified. They have never been able to escape the feeling that politics in Ottawa really ought to be about Grits and Tories, and nobody else, and at their first chance they are reverting to form. It's a disgrace, but it's typical. Ditto the Liberals. They have made their decision. All that remains is to make it official. As for voters, well, the succussful Naheed Nenshi and Alison Redford campaigns do suggest that, done properly, "transformational" drivel without much substance can succeed, although in neither case did those candidates face opponents who were serious about policy beyond reptition of neoconservative nostrums. I tend to think Mr. Trudeau will start to sound silly to voters after a spell - but then, I'm an incurable optimist and I recall thinking that about the last Mr. Trudeau too.

Login or register to post comments