rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The Liberal record on asbestos so far worse than the Conservatives'

Image: Flickr/thirtyfootscrew

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

"My experience with the current government is worse than what I experienced with the former Harper government."

Now this isn't the kind of statement the honeymooning Trudeau government is used to, especially not from a universally respected progressive activist like Katherine Ruff. Ms. Ruff is Canada's most prominent and knowledgeable advocate for a ban on all asbestos, a known potential killer of those exposed to it.

Under the Harper government, Canada was among the world's greatest promoters of something called chrysotile asbestos, and Ms. Ruff spent many frustrating years pressuring them to change their dishonourable stance. But, as she wrote me, "At least the Harper government responded to letters, even if their responses were appalling."

In spite of her numerous letters and phone calls to Liberal Health Minister Jane Philpott and Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, Ms. Ruff's requests to speak to someone -- anyone -- in their offices "have met a total wall of refusal."

"I will be referring your request to our Public Inquiries team," emailed Marissa Harfouche, media relations spokesperson for the Environment Ministry. "You will be hearing back from them as soon as possible." And again: "Thank you for contacting Environment and Climate Change Canada. As mentioned over the phone, we will...follow up with you when possible." These were dated June 27.

Ms. Ruff's experiences, as she has made clear in her correspondence with these ministries, shared with me, add up to a "lack of transparency, lack of democracy and lack of respect...in trying to communicate with the government over the past eight months, which is the opposite to what Prime Minister Trudeau promised."

Ms. Ruff's campaign began last November, with a letter to Health Minister Jane Philpott on behalf of 140 civil society organizations and health experts from Canada and around the world, "calling on your government to ban asbestos. As you know, for the past decade, the former [Conservative] government has played the most important role in the world to promote the use of asbestos in developing countries and to deny the scientific evidence that asbestos is harmful to health and should not be used. Canada's role has been shameful.

"Around the world, health experts, civil society organizations and asbestos victims are hoping that you, as Minister of Health, will send a new message that supports scientific evidence and supports protecting health. We believe, from your background, that you share our values of supporting scientific evidence and not causing harm to the health of populations."

Dr. Philpott's background includes many years doctoring in West Africa, so she's expected to be particularly sensitive to the fact that it's especially "populations in the global South...who are still having massive amounts of asbestos shipped to their countries as a 'safe product' to be put in their homes, schools and public buildings."

Let me add a personal note here. I write as the self-appointed head of the Jane Philpott Fan Club. I consider Dr. Philpott a friend and have repeatedly spoken admiringly of her. Even though she's a Liberal -- nobody's perfect -- I cheered her election victory and then her appointment as Minister of Health. And I made clear I had high expectations of her. Now I simply can't fathom the failure of Dr. Philpott or anyone in her office to do more than brush Kathleen Ruff off as a pest while the Trudeau government maintains the status quo on the asbestos file.

While Ms. Ruff is snubbed and the government stalls, asbestos interests, she reports, are busy lobbying to ensure that chrysotile asbestos is not put on the UN's hazardous substance list. Ms. Ruff believes that Canada can live up to Trudeau's promises and play a key leadership role at the UN in getting chrysotile asbestos listed, a move that would be extremely influential around the world.

Typical of Ms. Ruff, she is surprisingly understanding of possible constraints on the Trudeau government. Here's what she told me: "I have been enormously patient and respectful and cut Jane Philpott and the Trudeau government a huge amount of slack and have held off criticizing them on their failure to handle the asbestos issue ethically or rationally and their disrespectful treatment of us. When people who signed the letter [above] ask me why we haven't had a response and feel insulted, I have tried to explain that Philpott has many important, challenging issues on her plate."

But Ms. Ruff now considers Canada's position -- that it does not know whether warning labels and protective measures should be required on asbestos exported around the world -- to be "such an extreme level of unethical conduct" that she finally decided to go public recently with an op-ed in the Ottawa Citizen.

As Ms. Ruff urgently insists, while the government temporizes, people in Canada and around the world are dying from exposure to asbestos fibres. How does the government rationalize that?

Instead of refusing even to respond to Ms. Ruff's eight months of calls and messages, or putting her off until some future time, shouldn't my friend Jane Philpott and her colleague Catherine McKenna be embracing her offer to work co-operatively on a strategy to eliminate asbestos? It is after all a matter of life and death.

This article originally appeared in The Globe and Mail.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Image: Flickr/thirtyfootscrew

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.