At the G8 and G20 Summits, the Harper government is touting its plan for governments around the world to cut their deficits in half by 2013 and to stabilize their debt-to-GDP ratios by 2016. In a letter sent to G20 leaders on the eve of the summit, Harper declared that "advanced countries must send a clear message that as their stimulus plans expire, they will focus on getter their fiscal houses in order." It's a plan, which if enough governments actually signed on, would plunge humanity into a global depression.
In the autumn of 2008, as financial institutions in the United States, the U.K. and other countries crashed, the world came very close to a descent into depression. What pulled the global economy back from the brink was the willingness of governments, led by the United States, to inject vast amounts of capital into the economy. Without the direct spending begun by the Bush administration and continued by the Obama administration, we would have seen a repeat of the 1930s.
And the global economic crisis is far from over. Alarming signs in both the United States and Europe make it clear that major economies are flirting with the danger of a second major crash. After a tax credit expired, housing purchases have plunged in the United States. New home sales in the U.S. dropped by 32.7 per cent in May, to an annual rate of 300,000, the lowest level since record keeping began. In Europe, the lesson being learned from the Greek calamity and the general risk of countries being unable to meet their debt payments, is that governments must adopt severe austerity regimes. Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel is a major proponent of this is as Britain's new prime minister David Cameron.
It's not that debt doesn't matter. At the heart of the U.S. economic malaise are three interconnected layers of debt: the national debt of about $12 trillion; the indebtedness of individual Americans of about $11 trillion; and the rising net indebtedness of the United States to other countries, a debt that now totals several trillion dollars. The current economic crisis in which these debts are the elephant in the room is forcing the repositioning of the United States to play a smaller role in the global economy.
That repositioning will continue for many years to come. But if the U.S. and other major countries slam the brakes on government spending, the world will be pushed into a deflationary downward spiral. Unemployment will rise and many countries will be pushed back into recession. The U.S. needs to deal with its debt problems in such a way as not to convert the current economic malaise into a catastrophe. Over time, the U.S. will need to sharply raise taxes for the rich and the affluent, refashion its trade relationships with China and other countries, and re-launch its crumbling manufacturing sector.
Massive skepticism about whether the U.S. political system and culture can successfully manage the transition is in order.
In the meantime, though, the potential consequences of the rush to austerity that Stephen Harper and others are championing are all too obvious.
Advertising
Harper and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty have never had a clue about the economy. Two weeks after the October 2008 federal election, while financial institutions and markets around the world were crashing, Flaherty assured a business audience that Canada would not need to run a government deficit at all. A couple of months later, the intrepid minister of finance unveiled a budget that announced that Ottawa would have the highest deficit in history.
Now the Harper government is back to putting ideology ahead of economic thinking. The Conservatives plan to continue lowering tax rates for corporations and the wealthy and they are determined to slash government spending, except for military outlays. Bash public servants, hold down their incomes, and cut social spending -- that's the recipe. If adopted by a large part of the world, it's a recipe for depression.
On the bright side, nobody outside Canada much cares what the Harper government thinks on this or any other subject. Recent polls show that in the U.S., Britain, France and Germany, most people take little account of Canada and Canadians and think of us as a minnow not a shark.
That's cool.
This week, Stephen Harper is playing the twin roles of manager of the Deerhurst Inn and director of the paramilitary occupation of Toronto.
Personally, I look forward to the G8 and G20 getting the hell out of here as quickly as possible. Future summits should be held online, or if the massive egos that lead these countries insist on meeting in person, let them do so on an aircraft carrier in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. That's more their speed.
Reducing the normally vibrant city of Toronto to a comatose vegetable has not been a pretty sight. We have been treated to the methods of a police state where there is no connect between the people and their supposed leaders. This must never be allowed to happen in our country again.
Let's declare Canada a Summit Free Zone.

Why has Stephen Harper's minority goverment been allowed to survive this long and entrench itself to the extent that this tinpot Deform party reject is now dictating more recipes for global disaster capitalism? Why have the Liberals and NDP not brought him down? Obviously because it is in their narrow political interests to keep him there. They bear as much responsibility as Harper for all the ills that have attended upon his rule. A pox on all their houses.
Close to $1.5 B spent on this weekend get together--$1 B on policing it.
$2 B is going into more jails and/or jail cells and probably another $1 B going into the military.
Does anyone else see the pattern here? Clearly the Reform Party wants to reduce this country into a police state with a military supremacy.
Close to $5 B on this alone. Imagine $5 B spent on health care,education,affordable housing or job training.
This $$$ will come at the cost of something...And you can gauran-damn-tee that the usual suspects will take the full impact.
Yep...The sick,the poor and the under-educated.
And all through this,who is propping these degenerates up in Ottawa?
Yep...Iggy and the PLC.
"But if the U.S. and other major countries slam the brakes on government spending, the world will be pushed into a deflationary downward spiral."
------------------------
Reducing the spiral of deficits and controlling debt-to-GDP is hardly slamming the brakes on government spending. Even if the G8 agreed whole-heartedly with Hippo's plan, governments would still be the single largest economic player in each of the G8/G20 economies. As for taxing the rich, while always a political game winner for a populist politicians, it isn't the best tax policy choice available. Economically speaking, consumption taxes like the GST/HST/VAT are better than income taxes. What the US requires is a national GST/HST/VAT but alas no one in the US has the political will - or the political capital - to do the right thing. Well, that and cut military spending by 75%.
Deficit spending cannot go on for ever. You know this, I know this and most every Canadian that suffered through 1979-1999 knows this.
So if we don't begin to reduce our deficit spending in 2011 then when? 2013, 2015, 2020? Waiting for economic indicators to reach appropriate levels is like waiting for planets and moons to align.
Just FYI...."In a report released Wednesday, Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page concludes the cost of the G8 portion in Huntsville appears to be par with similar summits in past, but can't properly evaluate the massive Toronto G20 security exercise - largely because other jurisdictions did not fully disclose their security costs."
For someone who claims the title 'AntiSpin', you certainly seem to spin all the standard neoliberal orthodoxies.
Do us the courtesy of providing sources for quotes in the future, please.
Just to update my original post...$5 B on police,military and prisons was (ironically) a conservative figure.
The number is actually over $20 B.
They've pissed away years of continuous surpluses and have managed to run up the biggest deficit in Canadian history.
And who will pay for it?...Those who can hardly afford their rent...And the Cons wouldn't want it any other way.
If you look at the conservative governments in Canada and the USA of the the 21st century,they are no longer fiscally responsible.
They are committed to spending astronomical wads of money (the taxes they squeeze from us ordinary folks) to corporate interests and 'new ' industries as there is money to be had from war and from prisons.
21st Century Conservatives don't even try to hide their fascist tendencies any more because they don't have to.
The media and a SPINELESS opposition have made fascism a populist movement.
Bravo...
Inmates are ,truly, in charge of the asylum .