rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Media Watch: About those corporate media editorials endorsing the BC Liberals

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

It's Election Day in B.C. and the NDP is widely expected to end a dozen years of rule by the BC Liberals. As usual in B.C. elections, major corporate-owned newspapers have come out in favour of the corporate-backed Liberals. But the editorials are less than ringing endorsements and -- in the case of the Globe and Mail -- less than totally accurate. And there's one big editorial endorsement missing. 

The Vancouver Sun editorial board has -- in an unusual move for them -- declined to issue an election editorial endorsement. This can be read as a lack of confidence in Christy Clark and the BC Liberals. 

 The Vancouver Province, for its part, issued an editorial that focused almost entirely on matters of personality and 'leadership' in asserting that Christy Clark was the better choice over Adrian Dix and the NDP. 

Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail wrote a convoluted and error-filled editorial endorsing the BC Liberals. David Beers, the editor of The Tyee, has written a stinging critique of the Globe editorial. Beers writes, in part: 

The Globe and Mail published an editorial on Friday evening endorsing Christy Clark and the BC Liberals to form the next government for British Columbia. Adrian Dix and his New Democrats were deemed by the Globe too "risky." The editorial cited among key reasons Dix's opposition to the TransMountain pipeline and the fact that while he presents himself as moderate, he is running with "left wingers" who would "wield influence."

One might assume that at Canada's self-styled national newspaper of record the act of advising British Columbians on who they should choose to elect to run their province would be considered a weighty and important task. The Globe has excellent reporters in British Columbia ready and available to offer their insights and fact check the resulting editorial... one might think.

Instead, the Globe's editorial writer(s) couldn't properly spell the name of one of the NDP politicians they declared too "left-wing" and therefore risky. It's George Heyman, not, as the editorial had it, George Hayman.

Even more startling, the editorial embraces the TransMountain pipeline even as it gets wrong what stuff that pipeline now carries, describing it as a "gas pipeline that runs from Alberta and ends in the Vancouver suburb of Burnaby" that is proposed to begin carrying oil. Certainly the Globe's reporting team based in Vancouver knows the existing TransMountain pipeline already carries oil.

Which raises the question: Who wrote the Globe editorial, how was it fact checked if at all, and who gave it final approval?


You can read the full piece by David Beers in The Tyee here

The other noteworthy thing about the Globe and Mail editorial is how hedging and reluctant they are in actually endorsing the BC Liberals. Although the editorial is framed in terms of how "risky" it would be to elect the NDP -- the same theme as a series of negative attack ads by the BC Liberals, it just so happens -- it does concede that the Liberal 'brand' is toast in B.C. and urges the Liberals to rename the party, even if they win. Adrian Dix, on a personal level, receives quasi-praise in the editorial for being a "business-minded socialist," whatever that means. 

Luckily, there are many places where you can find intelligent commentaries about the B.C. election. We've run opinion pieces this week making the case for voting NDP, as well as pieces urging a vote for the Green Party of BC, who are hoping to win their first ever seat in the legislature. 

To find all of rabble.ca's B.C. election coverage in one place, visit this page

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.