rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.


policyfix's picture
Policyfix is a blog of the CCPA Manitoba office, providing thoughtful analysis of current issues and viable alternatives to government policy.

A living wage lifts workers and the economy

| October 6, 2014
Photo: Wikipedia.org

As of October 1, minimum-wage earners in Manitoba will earn $10.70 per hour -- just over $20,800 annually. This leaves a family of four, with both parents working, with an income that is more than $1,500 below the poverty line. Single-parent families are worse off with incomes more than $8,000 short. It is widely agreed that a job can be the best pathway out of poverty. But this is only true if wages meet basic needs.

Approximately 38,600 Manitobans work for minimum wage and they are not just teenagers looking to earn extra cash. The majority are over the age of 20 and nearly half work for companies with more than 500 employees. Given that so many minimum-wage earners are adults, we need to ask why our minimum wage does not provide a sufficient income to raise a family.

The inadequacy of the minimum wage is further demonstrated when it is compared to the living wage -- calculated to be just over $14 per hour in Winnipeg. This living wage enables a family of four, with two working parents, to meet its basic needs. It is based on the actual costs of living in Winnipeg. The living wage for a single parent family is even higher.

The living wage is based on a bare-bones budget without the extras many of us take for granted. Costs considered include food, clothing, rent, transportation, child care, health care, adult education, some household expenses, and a small emergency fund. It does not include interest payments, retirement savings, homeownership, savings for children's education, or the costs of caring for a disabled, ill, or elderly family member.

The province should be recognized for making regular incremental increases to the minimum wage. There is, however, a long way to go before all minimum wage families can live above the poverty line. But poverty-line wages do not build healthy communities and stimulate the economy. The province should take more aggressive action to close the gap between the minimum wage and the living wage. Critics will argue that higher than inflation increases are excessive. But given that the minimum wage is so inadequate, we need these increases to make the minimum wage a living wage.

Even so, the $14 living wage for a family of four is still not high enough to bring the 2,300 minimum-wage single-parent families in Manitoba above the poverty line. Stronger government social policies and programs that benefit single parent families with low incomes can help fill the gap by shifting certain costs off families' shoulders. For example, a universal provincial child-care program would substantially lower the wage single-parent families need to meet their needs.

In addition to more generous increases in the minimum wage and stronger social programs, the province and city should adopt a living-wage policy that ensures their own employees, and those of the businesses they contract with, are paid the living wage. Jurisdictions across the world have begun to implement living wage policies and New Westminster, B.C. is the first in Canada.

Employers can also demonstrate leadership by paying the living wage now. This can be achieved through wages or a combination of wages and non-mandatory benefits. Living-wage employers, such as KPMG, Deloitte, Assiniboine Credit Union and Vancity Credit Union can benefit from decreases in absenteeism, higher worker productivity, and better worker retention.

It should be noted that substantive minimum-wage increases and living-wage policies are much more effective at decreasing poverty than increasing the personal income tax exemption, an approach perennially advocated for by business.

For example, Manitoba Federation of Labour calculations show that a $1,000 increase in the basic personal tax exemption would save a minimum-wage worker $108, whereas a 50-cent increase to the minimum wage would improve the worker's annual income by $1,040 per year.

Furthermore, the increase in the basic personal income tax exemption would apply to all Manitobans rich or poor. This and other "fixes" to our tax system proposed by business would remove millions of dollars from revenues needed to pay for social programs and income transfers that help close the affordability gap low-income Manitobans face as a result of an inadequate minimum wage. Our tax system does not need to be fixed -- the net income of Manitoba's lowest income earners increases as a result of our tax and transfer system.

Business will always resist minimum-wage increases arguing that they lead to job loss. But, the most robust economic studies show that the net benefits to people with low incomes and the economy are far greater than any temporary job loss that might result from increasing the minimum wage. Closing the gap between the minimum wage and the living wage is a win-win strategy that provides income security for Manitoban families while stimulating our economy.

Kirsten Bernas is a researcher with the Canadian Community Economic Development Network and Lynne Fernandez holds the Errol Black Chair in Labour Studies at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Manitoba.

Photo: Wikipedia.org



We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.