rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Cost of learning growing faster than incomes

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Infographic: Take a Hike! From Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)

A new report by the CCPA, Eduflation and the High Cost of Learning, shows that the average university tuition bill in Canada has grown three times faster than inflation over the last 20 years. It's also outpaced the growth of family incomes, making university considerably less affordable for the average Canadian family than it used to be just 20 years ago.

The report tracks trends in university affordability for families by looking at the ratios between tuition fees and median family incomes over time, expressed as an index. The approach is very similar to the way we talk about housing affordability. The authors also compared tuition fees with poverty-line incomes to examine affordability for low-income families separately. Here's what they found.

Since the 1990s, education affordability declined in all provinces except Newfoundland and Labrador, where recent government policy of tuition roll-backs and freezes, combined with strong income growth, have significantly improved affordability for families earning the median income. Note, however, that while Quebec remains one of the most affordable provinces to go to university, their education affordability has worsened significantly over the last 20 years.

The report also looks at university affordability for low-income families and the findings are pretty grim. Affordability has worsened significantly more for low-income families than for the average Canadian family.

If tuition and incomes continue to grow at the levels we've seen over the last four years, the report projects that education will increasingly become out of reach for children growing up in low- and modest- income families.

One of the big contributions of this report is to highlight the extent of provincial differences in education. The lack of a national higher education strategy in Canada means that we don't actually have a higher education system in this country. What we have is 10 different systems, with very different tuition fees and student financial aid programs that have their own complex structures and eligibility rules.

We are all Canadians, but where one grows up makes a big difference in terms of education affordability. Education is between two and three times more affordable for a student in a median-income family in Newfoundland than it is for a median-income student in Ontario.

How does B.C. measure up? We're in the middle of the pack in terms of affordability. But there isn't much to celebrate -- I suspect the recent moderation of average tuition growth in B.C. is largely a product of the five "new" universities the government "created" in 2008 from existing non-university higher education institutions (as they charge lower fees than B.C.'s other seven universities). Our average student loan levels are relatively high and we charge the highest interest rate on provincial student loans in Canada.

How has the worsening affordability impacted students? Growing university enrollment numbers have led some commentators to conclude that it hasn't. This can't be further from the truth. Students from higher-income families continue to be better represented on university campuses than their peers who grew up in lower income families (though the latest numbers we have on who goes to university are from 2006 and badly need to be updated).

For students, growing tuition has meant that in most provinces, it is no longer possible to earn enough in a summer job to pay for tuition (let alone living expenses). Worsening affordability relative to family incomes, and growing household debt levels has meant that many Canadian families can't afford to provide much financial help for their children's education.

While government-based financial aid spending has increased, much of the support is now provided through loans rather than grants. It's hardly surprising, then, that student debt ballooned over a generation, doubling in real terms over the 1990s and growing more moderately, but still faster than inflation, over the 2000s. If these more moderate trends persist over the 2010s, I estimate that today's university students who borrow to pay for their education (58% of all students in 2009) are looking at an average debt load of $34,000 upon graduation in 2016. Students pursuing graduate programs will often borrow a lot more.

The rapid rise of student debt is perhaps the most important shift in higher education over the last generation. To say that it doesn't have an impact on students is simply not credible.

We know that lower-income students are more likely to borrow to finance their education. This is fundamentally inequitable, because it means that the lower-income students end up paying considerably more for the same education (through interest on their debt) than their peers whose parents can afford the tuition fees up front. There is increasing evidence that high debt levels are an obstacle for many of the highest-needs students as they transition into the workforce and start families.

It's estimated that over the next decade, more than three quarters of new jobs in Canada will require some form of post-secondary education. As higher education increasingly becomes a standard job requirement, isn't it time to expand public education beyond secondary schools and into institutions of higher learning and do away with tuition altogether? Many other countries have done this. Data from OECD's latest Education at a Glance report shows that out of 25 countries that provide data on tuition fees, two-thirds either charge no tuition at all or only charge nominal fees (lower than $1,200 US per year).

After all, it's hardly fair to lower income students to ask them to incur significant debt and suffer lasting financial consequences just to have a shot at a decent-paying job.

This article was first posted on Policy Note.

What's Harper up to?  Award-winning journalist Karl Nerenberg keeps you in the know. Donate to support his efforts today.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.