rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Stephen Harper and Economics 101

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who prides himself on being an economist, has characterized his government's fiscal policy as "expansionary."

If he really thinks the simple fact of running a budget deficit is "expansionary", he should repeat Economics 101.

The correct way to look at the question of whether fiscal policy is expansionary or contractionary is not to look at the budget balance in isolation, but to look at the year to year change in the cyclically adjusted budget balance as a share of GDP - i.e., the change in the budget balance (surplus or deficit) which can be attributed to discretionary actions on the spending and tax side rather than to changes in the underlying economy. Economists also look at the cyclically adjusted primary balance -- which excludes changes in debt servicing costs -- and at the cyclically adjusted budget balance as a share of potential GDP.

Estimates of these balances looking backwards are published in the Department of Finance Fiscal Monitor. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, the Government of Canada does not provide estimates for the current year, or projections. However, the IMF currently estimate that the total Canadian structural budget balance will fall by more than $14 billion or by 1 per cent of GDP in 2011 compared to 2010. This is the result of both federal and provincial actions.

The 2011 federal budget projections (Table 5.7) show that the federal budgetary balance will narrow by 0.3 per cent of GDP this year (from -2.2 per cent to -1.9 per cent) compared to last. While this is partly driven by a very modest cyclical recovery in tax revenues, the main factor is a fall in federal program spending of 0.3 per cent of GDP, from 14.8 per cent of GDP to 14.5 per cent of GDP. The budget itself (p.195) states that "the expiration of stimulus measures and the savings measures announced in the budget are expected to lower the ratio of program spending to GDP from 16.0% in 2009-10 to 12.9% in 2015-16."

In short, the federal government is deliberately cutting spending, which will lower GDP. While there is still a small deficit, fiscal policy cannot be described as "expansionary."

This article was first posted on The Progressive Economics Forum.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.