As we lurch towards the end of week one of this 41st Canadian federal election, I am particularly interested in those races where the Aboriginal vote could play a key role by virtue of their numbers. And few are more interesting or potentially consequential than the contest that's on now in the B.C. riding of Vancouver Island North.
That's because Vancouver Island North is represented by none other than current Indian and Northern Affairs Minister John 'No Race-based Fishery' Duncan. And last time around, the Honourable member and rookie cabinet minister just barely eked out a victory for his party over his closest rival, as seen by the CBC election results from 2008.
A total of 57,162 votes were cast in the last election in Duncan's riding, a race he won by just 2,485 votes, or apx. four per cent more than the second-place NDP candidate. Here's the thing: Aboriginal people make up 9% of that riding, or up to double the margin of victory.
In Duncan's riding of Vancouver Island North, which the Conservatives won by less than 2,500 votes in 2008, there were 10,065 residents of aboriginal descent. This is according to a page compiled by Statistics Canada.
Even if we assume half of that total Aboriginal population in this riding is of voting age, that's still 5,033 people -- more than enough to cancel out the 2,485 votes it took to get Duncan into office, should they vote as a bloc.
In other words, it could be Indians who hold the fate of the Indian Affairs minister in their hands.
And before anyone else says it, I am well aware that my headline is technically misleading, in that Indians may not actually get to 'pick' the next Indian Affairs minister, but, should they decide to collectively exercise their electoral muscle (not to be confused with pectoral muscle), they sure as hell will get to veto the current one. Call it the first shot fired across the bow by the brown baby boom. (I also acknowledge I am substituting 'Indians' for all Aboriginal people in the riding, essentially for poetic license. A more exact number-crunching needs to be done.)
Now, of course, I'd be the last person to assume that every Indian opposes the Conservative party: indeed, some are proudly card-carrying members. All I'm concerned with here is what I find to be something of a delicious irony: that, for once, Indians will get the chance to say 'yay' or 'nay' to whoever lords over them as minister of their 'Affairs.'
True, it'd be a symbolic (and, some might say, mostly-hollow) victory, but if nothing else, it could send a message as to what we think of what's being done on our collective behalf. And if it starts to awaken us to our voting power if and when we do act as a bloc, that might not be such a bad thing either.
And so, enemies of the current office-holder of the Indian Affairs department, you now have the means of initiating a "Dump Duncan" campaign.
Duncan devotees, you should now be aware of what you could be up against should you wish to protect your recently installed Captain of the Indian Industry. Proceed accordingly.
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.