rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

How 'Indians' might actually get to pick the next Indian Affairs minister

As we lurch towards the end of week one of this 41st Canadian federal election, I am particularly interested in those races where the Aboriginal vote could play a key role by virtue of their numbers. And few are more interesting or potentially consequential than the contest that's on now in the B.C. riding of Vancouver Island North.

That's because Vancouver Island North is represented by none other than current Indian and Northern Affairs Minister John 'No Race-based Fishery' Duncan. And last time around, the Honourable member and rookie cabinet minister just barely eked out a victory for his party over his closest rival, as seen by the CBC election results from 2008.

A total of 57,162 votes were cast in the last election in Duncan's riding, a race he won by just 2,485 votes, or apx. four per cent more than the second-place NDP candidate. Here's the thing: Aboriginal people make up 9% of that riding, or up to double the margin of victory.

In 2008, there were 88,077 electors on Elections Canada's list for the district. According to a Nov. 2010 piece in the Georgia Straight:

In Duncan's riding of Vancouver Island North, which the Conservatives won by less than 2,500 votes in 2008, there were 10,065 residents of aboriginal descent. This is according to a page compiled by Statistics Canada.

Even if we assume half of that total Aboriginal population in this riding is of voting age, that's still 5,033 people -- more than enough to cancel out the 2,485 votes it took to get Duncan into office, should they vote as a bloc.

In other words, it could be Indians who hold the fate of the Indian Affairs minister in their hands.

And before anyone else says it, I am well aware that my headline is technically misleading, in that Indians may not actually get to 'pick' the next Indian Affairs minister, but, should they decide to collectively exercise their electoral muscle (not to be confused with pectoral muscle), they sure as hell will get to veto the current one. Call it the first shot fired across the bow by the brown baby boom. (I also acknowledge I am substituting 'Indians' for all Aboriginal people in the riding, essentially for poetic license. A more exact number-crunching needs to be done.)

Now, of course, I'd be the last person to assume that every Indian opposes the Conservative party: indeed, some are proudly card-carrying members. All I'm concerned with here is what I find to be something of a delicious irony: that, for once, Indians will get the chance to say 'yay' or 'nay' to whoever lords over them as minister of their 'Affairs.'

True, it'd be a symbolic (and, some might say, mostly-hollow) victory, but if nothing else, it could send a message as to what we think of what's being done on our collective behalf. And if it starts to awaken us to our voting power if and when we do act as a bloc, that might not be such a bad thing either.

And so, enemies of the current office-holder of the Indian Affairs department, you now have the means of initiating a "Dump Duncan" campaign.

Duncan devotees, you should now be aware of what you could be up against should you wish to protect your recently installed Captain of the Indian Industry. Proceed accordingly.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.