"Nova Scotia's shale potential will remain in the ground," harrumphed Financial Post columnist Terence Corcoran. Blame "growth-killing theories and activists." "The McNeil Liberals have nailed shut one more economic doorway," fretted Chronicle-Herald columnist Marilla Stephenson. "It's a sorry day for Nova Scotia," tut-tutted her editorial overlings. "Fear is trumping science," piled on the Toronto Sun's Brian Lilley... Lilley? Really? He of the climate-change denying, Stephen-Harper apologizing Sun standing tall for science? But I digress.
For me, the most intriguing aspect of last week's announcement the province will ban hydraulic fracking is how quickly the chattering classes lined up in lip-lock lockstep to attack the government for being too craven to stand up to its own voters, and Nova Scotians -- that's us -- for being too stupid to know what's best for us.
Hydraulic fracking -- shooting huge volumes of pressurized water, sand and assorted chemicals, some of them carcinogens, into layers of shale rock deep under the earth's surface in order to release trapped oil and gas -- is the energy industry's new Holy Grail.
On the upside, fracking promises easier, more efficient access to ever declining, non-renewable energy. On the downside, there's potential poisoned wells, contaminated air, maybe the odd man-made earthquake and, oh yes, the unknown. Not to forget the climate changes that come with the upside.
Contrary to federal Finance Minister Joe Oliver -- "the record is... unblemished" -- the jury is not yet "in" on fracking.
A Google search for fracking's past month's headlines: University of Texas scientists report 30 per cent of wells above an active area of drilling contain unusually high levels of arsenic; scientists at Duke discover high levels of methane in wells near drilling in Pennsylvania and New York, plus radioactivity in a fracking discharge site.
Although I think there should be a revisit date on the ban -- will the science be clearer in five years? -- I'm happy our government isn't bowing to the development-at-any-cost crowd.
I'm currently reading Toms River, Dan Fagin's Pulitzer-prize-winning book about the poisoning of a New Jersey town by a huge chemical company while don't-worry-be-happy politicians and opinion leaders ignored mounting evidence of what was happening.
Are we stupid? Or just cautious?
Photo: Ari Moore/flickr
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.