rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

May's behaviour unbecoming for a federal leader

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Elizabeth May

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Elizabeth May should apologize to Green Party members. May's behaviour since the Green Party convention a few weeks ago has not only left the public deeply confused, but also humiliated party members. 

No matter how you turn it, at issue is the passage of a Green resolution supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. At its core, this movement seeks to pressure Israel to respect the human rights of the Palestinians. The three demands BDS are 100 per cent aligned with international law and with existing Canadian foreign policy. Despite its non-violent and democratic approach for a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, some like May will have none of it.

May is free to disagree, but she should not wreck the party and its credibility to have her way. Before she lurches any further into the china shop, May should apologize, starting by acknowledging the facts about the passage of the resolution.  

The fact is, May's chat with CBC's Rosemary Barton was typical of several interviews May gave after the cConvention. To Barton she falsely asserted, "I'm quite certain most of our members don't support this policy."  Contrary to her claim, however, in online voting prior to the cConvention, the BDS resolution received 58.5 percent of the online votes -- clear proof that even before the cConvention, most members of the party did support the resolution. After debate at the cConvention itself, the support for the resolution was overwhelming -- so much so that there wasn't even a need for a count of hands.  

May has also argued that it was largely because the party adopted Robert's Rules of Order that the resolution passed. This is nonsense. May herself supported the move to Robert's Rules during procedural votes at the beginning of the cConvention. As for the resolution, it 1) met the required majority via the online voting, 2) passed successfully through committee at the cConvention, and 3) was passed overwhelmingly on the floor. Hardly a procedural fluke!  

Next, May should apologize for bad-mouthing party members who worked in good faith for the passage of the BDS resolution.  Green Party Quebec leader Alex Tyrrell points out that May publicly called some of them "one-issue people," and even made allusions to anti-Semitism. She has also publicly mused that some Green members joined the party only to enact this one resolution. For Green Party members who worked for months for the passage of the resolution, such comments are offensive and inappropriate.

May should also apologize for seeking to overturn the grassroots will of members. Tyrrell referred to the resolution as a "pristine exercise in grassroots democracy," and indeed it was. Yet rather than accept this vote as the decision of the membership, May immediately threatened to resign in protest. In addition to hanging this Sword of Damocles over the party, May actually confesses to Barton that her intent to resign would be to quickly force another convention and hence, a chance to reverse the BDS resolution. 

Finally, May should apologize for launching a questionable process to overturn the resolution. Earlier this week, May announced that the Green's Federal Council had voted to call a special meeting to revisit the resolutions passed at the Convention -- no doubt with the intent of overturning the BDS resolution. Yet, Section 6.4 of the Green Party Constitution asserts that the Federal Council is bound to implement the decision of the members' meetings. 

In a meeting I had with May in June, she bragged to me about how the Green Party is the only federal party where the party leadership is bound by the policy developed by the grassroots. For her own credibility, and for the ongoing viability of the party, I would ask her to live up to that boast.

Thomas Woodley is President, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.