'Fault Lines' grounds Haiti's earthquake and aftermath in the views of the people

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

International aid falls short and local organizations and Haitians continue to pick up the pieces

The Haiti earthquake of 2010 has inspired rather a lot of books and articles describing personal experiences of its extraordinary destruction -- or maybe it seems like a lot to me because I research on the effects of development aid and philanthropy in a nation that seems to lurch from one disaster to the next without some, if any, signs of progress.

Now, with Fault Lines: Views Across Haiti’s Divide, author and activist Beverly Bell has added her voice to those writers like Dr. Paul Farmer, co-founder of the medical NGO Partners in Health, long-time Haiti observer Amy Wilentz and the Associated Press correspondent, Jonathan Katz, who was working in Haiti at the time.

But it would be a mistake to think that Bell is simply giving us another version of the same horrific scenes and tragic stories of injury and loss. While previous books have offered interesting and valuable accounts of the inefficacy of much post-earthquake aid, Bell’s perspective in Fault Lines is unique -- and hugely important.

It is the only book I have come across which grounds the earthquake and its aftermath in points of view that have been largely missing until now -- those of Haiti’s many, usually ignored, grassroots social movements.

Bell does offer compelling verbal pictures of sidewalks replaced by "ground concrete that looked as if it had been through a blender, and rebar bent like bread-wrapper twist ties," as well as anecdotes of people finally making it home only to find that their entire family is dead.

However, we also learn of the relief project set up by the Association for the Promotion of Integrated Family Health in the Carrefour-Feuilles section of Port au Prince to provide daily meals to people who had lost everything in the earthquake. With some international support money, APROSIFA contacted 60 neighbourhood street vendors and paid them to purchase food from Haitian farmers and cook meals for ten to 15 specific homeless families.

Officially, the project provided food for approximately 4800 people every day. In fact, that number was far higher, Bell writes, "because when the women finished serving those they were responsible for, they kept dishing out food to hungry folks who dropped by until their pots were empty."

In Belair, another extremely poor part of the Haitian capital, an organization with a long history in the neighbourhood called Solidarité Ant Jen (Solidarity Among Youth) took over a damaged kindergarten and began offering shelter and meals, along with medical and psychological care, to 400 displaced people.

And, in the country’s Central Plateau, the Mouvman Peyizan Papay (Peasant Movement of Papaye) provided lodging, meals and clothing to several dozen of the estimated 600,000 earthquake victims who fled the damaged capital and thus received no international disaster aid at all. The Mouvman took up a collection to help peasant families inundated by the sudden return of traumatized relatives, and even slaughtered two cows so they could bring food to patients at the Partners in Health hospital in nearby Mirebalais.

It is not that international participation was entirely absent from these projects though. In Belair, water was delivered by a Canadian non-profit and some funding came from a German company.

However, unlike the vast majority of well-meaning emergency aid efforts -- often surrounded by foreign soldiers and in some cases tossing sacks of rice out of helicopters "as if we were dogs," as many complained to Bell -- these alternative programs were set up and directed by Haitians. In these few salient cases, our good intentions met their terms, their requirements.

The difference is summed up by APROSIFA’s Rose Anne Auguste when she points out that local organizations like hers "have our own vision of reconstruction for our country. We have a philosophy that corresponds to our reality, not the reality of the international community. What we want is for the international community, the foundations and agencies, to hear our philosophy and our dream for our people, our country."

However, that indigenous vision was rarely taken into account as hundreds of international agencies, large and small, scrambled to deal with symptoms -- the medical emergencies and the lack of housing, food and water. This indigenous vision was largely ignored during the post-earthquake reconstruction phase as well.

As the tide of cash that flowed into Haiti in the early months of 2010 receded again, what has been left littering the shore are hundreds of examples of foreign plans and initiatives that fail to meet the needs of Haiti’s vast majority of poor.

"Corporations with little or no knowledge of Haiti," Bell writes, "were brought in as volunteers to plan, kick off and even staff the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission, the actor with the single greatest operational influence over shaping the reconstruction model after the earthquake."

Talk about Haiti with most people and they will inevitably ask what happened to all the money that was pledged and donated by governments, international lending institutions and regular folk like them. The short answer is: we just don’t know.

A lot went back to donor governments, with the United States, for example, using half of its $1.3 billion relief funding to pay itself for its emergency efforts and massive -- as in 20,000 military personnel -- security detail. And while global donors, including Canada, pledged just over $6 billion in financial aid, nine-tenths of it went to non-Haitian organizations.

Less than ten per cent -- $580 million --went to the Haitian government, and less than one per cent -- $36 million -- to local Haitian NGOs and businesses. As a Canadian International Development Agency press release announcing an initial grant of $150 million put it, every dollar would go "to facilitate rapid action by trusted and experienced humanitarian agencies" -- in other words, Canadian and United Nations relief organizations.

But how many of those foreign agencies spent, and on what exactly, is considered proprietary information. While some of it may have been helpful, "the lack of transparency," writes Bell, "has also empowered opportunists to disregard standards, quality and honesty."

The justification used by the majority of big donors, many of which have been working in Haiti for decades, is that local institutions and government lack "absorptive capacity" -- the ability to use and account for the money properly. Yet, many small local organizations beyond the media glare were quick to offer help and solidarity to their suffering compatriots.

As Solidarity Among Youth volunteer and psychology professor Lenz Jean-Francois tells Bell, "what will traumatize the Haitian people even more than the 35 seconds of the earthquake is finding themselves, from one day to the next, standing with bowls in their hands and waiting for someone to give them a sheet so they can sleep. This dependence is terrible for people’s identity. People need to know we can count on ourselves. We have the capacity."

As Fault Lines so clearly shows, the 2010 earthquake response only mirrors the inadequacies of decades of top-down development aid, with impoverished Haitians obliged to take whatever they can get rather than designing and implementing their own ideas for social and economic progress, supported by our collective solidarity.

Well-intentioned as many international non-profits may be, what they cannot do, says Bell, is "alter the structural nonaccountability between their employer, the government of their host country and the people with whom they work. The agencies’ foreign funding, largely foreign staff and political relationship with Haiti dictate much about their effects in Haiti."

More heartening news however can be seen in the continued combative response of dozens of organizations, which may have lost their offices, their only computer and even their own members in those fateful 35 seconds of devastation.

Fault Lines describes how these organizations and Haitians have demonstrated against donations of Monsanto seeds, and for proper housing. They have forced the courts to bring criminal cases against men who raped girls and women in the IDP camps.

Their relentless campaigning may seem modest, even puny, compared to big, publicity-grabbing schemes like five-star hotels and the Caracol Industrial Park, like a shout in a hurricane. But they are the best hope there is for solutions to the vast inequality that lies at the intersection of Haiti’s social and economic tectonic plates.  

Augusta Dwyer is the author of Broke But Unbroken: Grassroots Social Movements and Their Radical Solutions to Poverty.

related items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.