B.C. First Nations groups criticize Bill C-3 as marching aboriginal women reach Ottawa

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

The AMUN Marchers reached Ottawa after a month-long protest march. This photo is from earlier in the march. Left to right: Viviane Michel, Danielle Guay, Sharon McIvor, Michele Audette

VANCOUVER, BC, PRESS RELEASE--(Marketwire - June 1, 2010)

We, the undersigned Indigenous organizations and individuals, have considered Bill C-3 (Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act) which was introduced by the minister in response to the direction given by the B.C. Court of Appeal in the McIvor v. Canada (Indian Registrar) case to eliminate discrimination in Indian Act against descendants of Indian women who lost status due to marriage.

We acknowledge that these changes are minor and will not address broader issues of discrimination under the Indian Act (such as the second generation cut-off under s. 6(2) which currently denies generations of children status), or the recognition of Indigenous nationhood, citizenship and laws as protected under s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 and reflected in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which directs that:

* Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
* States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:
* Any form of forced assimilation or integration...

Recognition of Indigenous peoples' right to determine our own citizenship according to our own laws -- which respect and honour the role of Indigenous women within Indigenous societies and cultures -- is essential to our continued survival as peoples.

There are immediate changes which can be made to Bill C-3 to address issues of immediate discrimination against Indian women and their descendants. Such changes were suggested by the Standing Committee, but overruled by the Speaker. It is within the power of the prime minister and cabinet to institute changes to Bill C-3 which would eliminate several areas of discrimination that remain against descendants of Indian women who lost status due to:

(a) Their grandmother's marriage to a non-status man, if they were born before the September 4, 1951 cut-off date currently reflected in Bill C-3; and

(b) The fact that the registrar "deemed" their father/grandfather to be non-status. Currently, Bill C-3 restores status to people who lost status due to marriage of an Indian woman to a non-status man, but does not address the situation of people who were born outside of marriage and lost status because the Indian Registrar deemed their father to be non-status.

There is an opportunity to prevent further discrimination against Indigenous women and their descendants through some minor amendments to Bill C-3 to apply the Act to both those who lost status due to marriage to a non-status person, and those who lost status even though they were born outside of wedlock because the Registrar deemed their father to be non-status.

We strongly urge the Government and opposition parties to make amendments to Bill C-3 to:

1. Eliminate the 1951 Cut-Off date for return of status, and to include those who are denied status, even though their Indian woman ancestor lost status due to marriage, because they were born before September 1951.

2. Include those who lost status because they were born outside of marriage, and the Registrar deemed their father to be non-status (under s. 11(e) of the Indian Act as it then was).

These amendments are necessary to address issues of fundamental justice and fairness to Indian women and their descendants who continue to face discrimination under the Indian Act. If these minor amendments to Bill C-3 are not made, Canada will face future Charter challenges, and will perpetuate discrimination against Indigenous women and their descendants.

Finally, long-term solutions do not lie in further tinkering with the Indian Act. Our Nations have an inherent right to determine who is and who is not a Citizen of our Nations in accordance with our own laws, customs and traditions. This is fundamental to self-government. The real and ultimate solution to addressing ongoing discrimination in the Indian Act lies in the full recognition of First Nations' jurisdiction over our own citizenship.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of:
Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President
Chief Willie Charlie, Vice-President
Chief Bob Chamberlin, Secretary-Treasurer
First Nations Summit
Grand Chief Doug Kelly
Dan Smith
Grand Chief Edward John
BC Assembly of First Nations
Regional Chief Jody Wilson-Raybould

To read Sharon McIvor's letter to MPs, please click here.

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.