The 14 women killed at École Polytechnique in Montreal 22 years ago were remembered by over a hundred participants at a public education forum for ending violence against women, which took place at The Cultch on Vancouver's East Side on Dec. 3, one of many such events across the country.
Fourteen other people, 10 women and four men, were also injured during the Montreal Massacre, which took place on Dec. 6, 1989.
Those gathered talked, listened, and strategized around women's resistance to violence against women. The day was filled with sadness and strength, inspiration and frustration, as women discussed the power of women and the difficulties of combating gendered violence in a patriarchal world.
Many stories shared were very personal and while it was impossible not to connect one's own lived experiences to that systematic abuse, the thread that ran throughout the day was about the responsibility political authority. As Daisy Kler, a member of the South Asian Coalition on Ending Violence Against Women, said: "Violence against women is a political issue. A question of power and domination, not an individual pathology."
During a panel called "The State Betrayal of Battered Women," Angela Marie MacDougall, of Battered Women's Support Services (BWSS), pointed out that "colonization is at the heart of violence against women." It was something participants were reminded of throughout the day as women discussed experiences of marginalization and violence directly related to Canada's legacy of racism and of marginalization of Aboriginal women's voices.
This point seemed particularly pertinent in light of B.C.'s Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Women, which continued, even after a number of women's groups pulled out when funding for legal representation was denied.
That the voices of Aboriginal women and many of those who live in the Downtown Eastside were left out of the inquiry has led many to question whether or not the process would provide anything in terms of preventing further violence to marginalized women. Lee Lakeman, of Vancouver Rape Relief, said: "It's important that you realize this is set up by the provincial government... and they could have, at any point, improved and expanded it. They still could." This inquiry has continued without the voices of the women most affected.
Advertising
So while, on one hand, women and women's organizations desperately need state support in terms of funding, in terms of the way in which systems and processes are set up, in terms of dealing with violence against women, and in terms of simply naming this abuse as gendered, the state has never been a friend to women. Women rely on a system that has abandoned them many times over.
"At BWSS, there are over 9,500 requests each year and the requests of battered women remind us very much that it is the most pressing social issue of our time," MacDougall said.
Women are made to, out of necessity, reach out to the state for help, she said, for safety and for justice and yet, when they do they are betrayed. We have, somehow, erased gender relations and power dynamics in areas like family law, which has adopted an approach of gender, class and race neutrality that makes it an extremely dangerous place for women to go for help, as often, it can compound the feeling of helplessness and silencing women already experience in situations of abuse.
"No state apparatus is working in favour of women," Kler responded.
A panel which looked at prostitution as a form of violence against women, concluded the day. Lakeman said this gender neutrality which was in the process of infiltrating the law and state systems was also being forced into conversations around prostitution.
She said, in relation to the missing women inquiry, that some wanted the term "prostitute" replaced by the term "sex worker," skipping over what she described as the key word: "woman."
Lakeman added that police are required to acknowledge categories in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and, therefore, pay extra attention as well as offer protective support to women and, in particular, Aboriginal women.
"There is no category in the law called 'sex worker.' It may look like they're pretending to be co-operative or respectful but what they're really doing is getting out of their Charter obligation," she said.
"When people press you to say 'sex worker' it's really important that you know it isn't just a matter of opinion -- one [term] gets the authorities out of any accountability and one holds them accountable for the status of women and the status of Aboriginal people."
Meghan Murphy is the host and producer of The F Word radio show and the editor of www.feminisms.org. She is a Master's candidate in the Department of Gender, Sexuality, & Women's Studies at Simon Fraser University and is completing a graduate degree at the UBC School of Journalism.
Dear rabble.ca reader... Can you support rabble.ca by matching your mainstream media costs? Will you donate a month's charges for newspaper subsription, cable, satellite, mobile or Internet costs to our independent media site?
The events of Dec 6 22 years ago changed my life. I was a teenager and discovered that I was also something else: a feminist.
It's very disappointing to me that an article about this important event would end on such a sour note with disrespect toward sex workers by dismissing the language sex workers have chosen to describe their work. The term sex worker was invented by an actual woman--Carol Leigh--and you are dismissing that history by claiming that the term came from the government in order to evade accountability. How ironic that the incredibly hard work that the sex workers rights movement does to gain freedom from violence is mis-represented in the process of talking about accountability to WOMEN. What a sad reminder of the ways that so-called feminists turn against other women too.
Hi Rita,
This article is reporting on an event. The contents of the article describe what happened at the event. I'm not going to simply invent things in order to satisfy your tastes. That would be dishonest. Lee did indeed discuss the origins of the term 'sex worker', the conference this took place at, and Carol Leigh. This piece is not about the history of the term, it is about a forum addressing violence against women and it points to a common thread discussed throughout the forum, which was the efforts of the state and others to neutralize gender. I actually find your comment, particularly on this day, to be wildly mislead and innapropriate. I have claimed nothing here, and am reporting on what actually happened and what was actually said, whether you like it or not - you cannot erase the voices of feminists simply because you disagree with them. It is disappointing that you have taken this opportunity, on a day when we are reminded that the feminist movement is desperately needed, that we need to end violence against women (and hatred of feminists) now, to try to silence the words and voices of women and feminists who are working with all their might, and have been working, tirelessly, for decades to make change.
Best,
Meghan
Meghan,
Your article, while on the surface is merely "reporting on an event", also promotes your personal point of view, and that of Lakeman, that prostitution by definition is violence against women. I call it your personal point of view because it is clearly not the point of view of all feminists.
I am a male sex worker and can only speak for myself and do not represent all sex worker voices. Nobody can claim to represent all sex worker voices because we are an incredibly diverse group.
That being said there is plenty of evidence to estimate that 20-25% of sex workers are male and trans-gendered people. And there is plenty of evidence that suggests that the vast majority of sex work transactions contain no violence whatsoever.
That is why sex workers get so upset when you, Lakeman and other prostitution-by-definition-is-violence-against-women feminists, continue for decades to promote the simplistic reduction of defining prostitution as violence against women.
Unfortunately the complexity of sex work and sex workers does not fit into your simple view of the world. And your simple reduction, especially when coupled with more calls for criminalization of sex work aka the Swedish model, does nothing to help further the cause for sex worker human rights be they women, men or trans people.
How, in this case, would you prefer I report on this event? It's almost as though you would prefer it if I simply did not cover events that diverge from your own views or advocacy at all? Is that true? I can't imagine what kind of coverage would fly for you if not only that with which you are in agreement. I'm sorry that this event did not reflect your views and interests but, as I'm sure you know, not everyone is in agreement on these matters.