Why Canada's Wheat Board will be missed

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a supporting member of rabble.ca.

In 2012, the Conservatives ended the 70-year monopoly seller status of the Canadian Wheat Board, one of the world's largest and most successful "state trading enterprises."

The government decision came without a vote among prairie grain farmers, required by the Canadian Wheat Board Act, and despite a 2011 plebiscite in which a majority of farmers voted to maintain the Board's status. The matter is now before the courts, but the Board cannot simply be revived after having been dismantled. Instead, a coalition of farmer groups has launched a class action suit against the government seeking billions of dollars in compensation.

Despite giving hundreds of millions of dollars each year in subsidies to tar sands companies, to cite just one example, the Conservative government fashions itself as libertarian, opposed to state intervention, and has long virulently opposed the Board, favouring the interests of giant agribusiness and anti-Board grain farmers.

The future of the Board has long been tenuous in the face of declining numbers of smaller farms, the rise of ever-larger ones, and the global expansion of giant transnational corporations that dominate the world's food system. It is estimated that between 70 and 90 per cent of the entire global grain trade is controlled by just four corporations: the "ABCD group," composed of ADM, Bunge, Cargill, and (Louis) Dreyfus. These giant grain traders have been rubbing their hands in anticipation of seizing control of the multi-billion dollar market once managed by the Board.

Against these odds, the persistence and long history of the Board is all that more remarkable. In the first half of the twentieth century, poor prairie farmers mobilized against powerful corporate rail, banking, and elevator monopolies, driving a tide of radical agrarian reform that, amidst the chaos and uncertainty of the Great Depression and the Second World War, led to the decision by the federal government in 1943 to authorize the Canadian Wheat Board to act as the "single-desk seller" for all Western Canadian wheat, durum, and barley sold internationally and for human consumption domestically.

Although originally envisioned as a temporary measure, the Board proved to be highly successful and popular, and was continually renewed and expanded over the next several decades, frequently receiving support from all major federal parties. During this time, Canada emerged as a leader in the international grain trade and today accounts for around 14 per cent of the world's wheat.

The Board's main activities centered on collectively managing prairie wheat, resulting in higher and steadier prices due to price pooling, stringent quality controls, and the ability of the Board to use its immense weight to offer coveted large contracts to major wheat importing nations for an additional price premium. The Board also offered farmers indirect benefits, promoting new innovations and acting as a representative of farmers in disputes with powerful corporate interests. For example, the Board played a central role in blocking the introduction of Monsanto GM modified wheat in 2004, and in recent years initiated an organic program that has made Canada one of the world's top growers of organic grain.

Throughout its history, the Board has brought countless gains to prairie farmers and served as a model example of effective collective marketing in action, defending the livelihoods of smaller grain farmers against the relentless tide of "free trade" rhetoric, which frames corporate monopolies as "market freedom."

This is no small feat in a world where libertarian fantasies so often rule the day (in rhetoric, not in practice as the recent trillion dollar Wall Street bailout so powerfully reveals). Against the preponderance of a political culture that celebrates individualism and selfishness, the moral force and cooperative ethos of the Wheat Board will be missed.


Gavin Fridell is a Canada Research Chair at Saint Mary's University and author of the forthcoming book, Alternative Trade (2013), which features a chapter on the Wheat Board.

This article was originally published in Watershed Sentinel and is reprinted here with permission. 

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.