The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled unanimously to strike down three provisions in Canada's prostitution laws. The ruling says that Parliament has one year to develop new legislation.
According to the ruling "each of the challenged provisions, considered independently, suffers from constitutional infirmities that violate the Charter."
Three sex workers -- Terry Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch, and Valerie Scott -- argued their right to security and safety has been violated by Canada’s prostitution laws, preventing them from working in the safety of their own homes or a bawdy house, and preventing them from hiring drivers. The prohibition on communicating with potential clients prevents them from assessing safety risks.
The three challenged provisions :
1. Communicating For The Purposes of Prostitution in a public place (section 213)
Repealing section 213, "communicating for the purposes of prostitution in a public place" allows sex workers to openly negotiate services. Removing this law means potentially allowing sex workers to no longer work in areas that are isolated and under-protected.
2. Living off the avails of prostitution (section 212)
Repealing section 212, "living off the avails of prostitution" allows sex workers to make decisions about who they want to work with and potentially remove the exploitation of sex workers by bosses.
3. Keeping a common bawdy house (section 210)
Repealing section 210, "keeping a common bawdy house" would allow workers to create their own collective workplaces run by and for other sex workers, which are potentially safer for sex workers.
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.