Another phony threat

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

The war on terrorism is more like the war on drugs, or even the war on poverty. It is a public relations campaign. We are to be persuaded there is a threat, get worked up about a war against a noun, in this case, an abstract noun.

The war on terror is a phony war; there is no terrorist threat to go to war against. Washington, and its Canadian friends would have you believe the war on terrorism is legitimate: it is no such thing. It is a rationale to do things that would otherwise be considered illegitimate, such as invade other countries — Afghanistan and Iraq — creating fear and anxiety around the world.

The terrorist threat is the successor to the Communist threat. That was equally phony, but more plausible since there were Communist states, all with armies on parade, and some with nuclear weapons.

There was a worldwide struggle with the “reds,” but never a war on Communism, in the sense we are supposed to believe there is a war on terrorism. But there were wars with Communist states — first North Korea, under UN auspices, and later, North Vietnam. The first threatened to broaden into a war against China, and was ended by the former Allied Commander (Europe), Dwight D. Eisenhower, when he was elected U.S. president. The second one was lost by the U.S. military.

The war on terrorism is more like the war on drugs, or even the war on poverty. It is a public relations campaign. We are to be persuaded there is a threat, get worked up about a war against a noun, in this case, an abstract noun.

The terrorists we are supposed to fear, have organizations, not states. Their war-making capacity ranges from homemade bombs to armed militia. Cunningly, they are rumoured to be a threat at any time, in any place, without it ever being said precisely who they are supposed to be.

The terrorist threat is part of the arsenal used by governments to get others to do things. The exercise of power requires governments to justify what they have done. Terrorism is an all-purpose excuse for thuggery.

The latest U.S. gambit is to prepare bomb attacks against Iran on the pretext Tehran is making bombs for Shiite militia operating in Iraq, and supplying Hezbollah in Lebanon. This would have the effect of broadening the war in Iraq to include making war on Iran, as another part of the war on terrorism.

The American political system will be sorely tested to deal with such an outlaw action: the Democrats are timid. American allies will be called upon to support the further insanity of an attack on Iran. The Stephen Harper Conservatives can be counted on to lend vocal assistance.

The Canadian Supreme Court has ruled against the Harper government claim that so-called security certificates are necessary to combat terrorism, even if they remove the right to know why a suspect was charged, and access to evidence of what the charges entail. The court argued, in effect, throw out freedom in the name of national security, and you end up with neither. This was not particularly original, but it was certainly welcome.

The House of Commons has rejected a government attempt to renew odious legislation introduced by a previous Liberal government in the wake of September 11 that allowed preventive arrest of suspected terrorists, and required people to testify without their consent. Prominent former Liberal ministers John Manley and Anne McClelland supported carrying on the charade of making nice with the Americans. The American party in Canada can always be counted upon to do the right thing by Washington, no instructions necessary.

It is time to quit pretending that our NATO membership, or NORAD, or NAFTA, or whatever, requires Canada to participate in the war on terrorism. It would be infinitely preferable to announce that Canadians have no intention of living in constant fear, and that there is no such thing as a war on something that cannot be identified.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.