Canada has a remarkably vibrant social media community. According to Michael Geist, we have the second highest per capita usage of Facebook in the world. Our cities are also stacked with revered social media innovators and well-followed media and technology commentators. Many of these organizations and personalities reach thousands or more with the stroke of a key.
What is social media?
Social media is a term used to describe web-based tools, spaces and practices people use to interact and share information online. For example, social networks like Facebook, Twitter, Myspace provide online tools that can be used for practices such as sharing media and engaging in online conversations, while also providing users with online personal space that form a repository of shared media and social interactions. Other commonly used social media tools include blogs, wikis, tagging services, social bookmarking, and RSS feeds. Social media tools, spaces and practices enable people to develop virtual communities by exchanging stories and experiences, and thereby developing a shared sense of meaning.
Social media is participatory and in a much deeper way than most traditional (offline) media. With traditional media like television, audience members mostly participate passively by consuming what is produced by others.
In stark contrast, online social media represent something of a return to a pre-print oral culture - more of a ongoing dialogue than a form of production and consumption - in the form of commentary, anecdotes, and shared stories (in various forms). Through social media the means of communication, the means of producing social meaning, narratives, and values have been returned to what Dan Gilmore calls "the people formally known as the audience."
Animated by networked conversations and shared media, the amalgamation of social media produces a living, breathing, interlinked media ecosystem. The question in my mind is, will this ecosystem defend itself when its very source of subsistence, the open Internet, is threatened?
This is not some abstract, hypothetical question: In the coming days Canada's federal communications regulator, the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunication Commission will issue a landmark ruling that has huge implications for the Internet in Canada. The CRTC decision will help determine whether Bell and other big telecoms can continue to "throttle", and thus increasingly control, Internet traffic. This is certainly not going to be the final battle over Canada's Internet, but it is a key battle.
Bell and other major Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are already slowing down ("throttling") online peer-to-peer (P2P) applications. In essence, this means we the users of the Internet already do not have access to all the Internet has to offer. If you're trying to watch a CBC show online and it takes a day to download because you're using a P2P application, as audience members reported last February, the limitations are quite real.
With the launch of Bell's unthrottled video store that competes with independent content using P2P applications, we already have a de facto tiered Internet in many markets; work with Bell you can get on the fast unthrottled lane, use independent peer-to-peer applications and deal with a slow lane with unreliable service. Perhaps more frightening, Internet throttling is not only limiting media choice, it is also scaring away innovation.
If you were an online innovator that wanted to utilize P2P services, why would you start your service in Canada where it is uncertain whether or not you and the users of your services will have open access to the applications you need? Will the next NowPublic, TheREALnews, or Biro Creative be scared away by the impending ISP gatekeepers?
If this "throttling" persists we can expect some innovators to move their activities south of the boarder. After all, the US Federal Communication Commission is set to uphold "net neutrality" rules, and thus the open Internet, by punishing Comcast for throttling service. Furthermore, President elect Barack Obama has put forth a plan that supports the open Internet, and the newly elected congress is poised to make net neutrality law.
A functioning Internet Immune System?
We saw this with the the remarkable movement for fair copyright legislation in Canada - the result of an uprising of concerned Internet users. The 1.5 million American citizens who lobbied politicians in 2007, demanding an open Internet, is further testimony to Cory Doctorow's assertion.
But there are a number of factors that differ between the U.S. and Canada. One factor is that the U.S. has powerful and well-funded media reform organizations, led by FreePress, which launched the SaveTheInternet.com coalition. Our own Campaign for Democratic Media is a very far cry from FreePress even if we factor in the relative population size. Secondly, the U.S. battle hit just as blogs were becoming a major political force, and as YouTube was gaining a critical mass.
In Canada, while the clout of media reform organizations is only beginning to grow, social media began to show their relevance in the recent federal election with groups like AnyoneButHarper, and Vote for The Environment. And in the just past Vancouver civic elections, social media was certainly a major force. Vancouverites using Facebook would have been hard pressed to avoid the onslaught of election-related Facebook groups and events, blogs, tweets, and a myriad of spontaneous online conversations.
So the question remains: if social media have breached the political power threshold, as it appears, will its immune system be triggered by the current threat posed by Internet throttling? Will the social media community mobilize to save Canada's Internet?
The Conservative federal government is NOT inclined to support an open Internet. To keep a level playing field on the Internet we'll need a robust citizens movement to put pressure on politicians and policy makers and shape policy that protects equal access.
The social web community can provide the foundation for this burgeoning movement - perhaps even serve as a catalyst. Consider this a call to action.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.