One of the most amazing things about this budget is that one of its three focuses is actually the opposite of what it's touting. You'll likely hear that $14 billion will be spent on infrastructure over the next 10 years (actually you may hear much bigger numbers, but they're just re-announcing existing programs like the gas tax transfer). What you won't hear is that 75 per cent of that money is going to be spent in or after 2020. In fact, there will be an affective $1 billion cut to infrastructure transfers to the cities in 2014-15.
The Building Infrastructure Fund is one of the foundations for federal-municipal infrastructure spending. It is currently spending $1.25 billion a year and expires in 2013-14. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (and the Alternative Federal Budget) was looking to have this renewed and significantly increased. However, what has happened is that spending in 2014-15 has gone from $1.25 billion to only $210 million -- a significant drop.
Now the government is saying that this plan is worth $14 billion over 10 years; however, 75 per cent of that money is scheduled for in or after 2020. The plan is heavily back-end loaded. Canada doesn't need strong growth and lower unemployment in 2020, it needs strong growth and lower unemployment today.
Also, the P3 fund is being renewed at $1.25 billion over 5 years -- the cities hate this fund and don't use it. It requires them to give away control to their corporate partners and pay more in interest on long-term projects. The previous P3 fund incarnation has only spent about 30 per cent of its total with 50 per cent allocated. In fact, half of the previous P3 fund has no plans for it at all. To build on this stupendous success it is being renewed so there is even more money that the cities can't use.
There is also a large change in how unemployment training is provided. The federal government devolved the unemployment training to the provinces in 2007. Now they are taking $500 million of that back through a new "Canada Job Grants" program. The feds will put in a third, the provinces a third and employers a third to provide training to unemployed or "under-employed" Canadians. The requirements are few and the control is in the hands of employers. Basically, if employers are running any training programs right now, they'll be able to claim them through this program and get funding for what they were already doing. The dead-weight loss will be significant.
However, we already know that Canadian employers spend much less on training than other countries, like the U.S. Canadian CEOs love to complain about the so called 'skills gap' while at the same time doing little to train their own employees to fill it, or hire new ones and train them. Given this lack of interest from employers, this program at most will provide $500 million, but if provinces or employers don't buy in, it could provide substantially less than that. All of this funding, or lack thereof, will be taken out of current training programs for the unemployed.
This year, the budget also provides a handy guide to the damage that austerity has already had on the Canadian economy (on page 298). From there, we learn that austerity in 2014-15 will have cut $11.8 in federal spending due to cuts in this and the previous two budgets. Using the economic multipliers handily provided in the 2009 stimulus budget, it is possible to calculate the economic and job impact of this austerity. In 2014-15 then, government austerity has reduced real GDP by 0.84 per cent. Now that may not seem like a lot, but since growth in 2014-15 is expected to only be 1.6 per cent, it's a pretty big deal. The total employment impact is approximately 90,000 fewer positions in the public and private sector due to austerity. When it came to the fast track to balancing the books, 75 per cent of it came from the expenditures side with only 25 per cent from the revenue side.
I did want to make a point about the deficit projections going forward and how it connects to stagnant growth in Canada. Last year at this time, the government estimated that the deficit in 2013-14 would be only $10.2 billion. Now, the deficit estimate for 2013-14 is almost twice that at $18.7 billion. This is the danger of slow growth. We keep expecting that three years out everything will be great again -- unemployment will be low, growth will be robust -- but once we get to three years from now, the economy is still stagnant. The continued revision of the deficit figures are a great example of this reversion to stagnation in action.
Now, the budget isn't all bad. The gas tax transfer to the municipalities will be indexed to inflation, something the AFB has called for, for many years. There is a new paid internship program for youth that mirrors some AFB efforts in that same area. There is some focus on tax evaders, although there is no movement on closing some of the most egregious loopholes like stock options deductions and meals and entertainment deduction.
Unfortunately, in the aggregate, this budget is on austerity autopilot. We need job-creating programs like infrastructure investments -- but what we got was cuts in infrastructure spending. The paradox of thrift continues in Canada with all sectors, consumers, business and government mired in stagnation.
Photo: Caitlin Thompson/Flickr
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.