rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Senate passes C-51. What now?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: mtsrs/flickr

Late Tuesday afternoon, by a vote of 44 to 28, the Senate approved the government's overkill anti-terrorism legislation, Bill C-51, without amendment. (You can see who voted which way at this link.) By doing so, senators ignored an almost airtight consensus in Canada's legal community that the security and information-sharing reforms in the bill won't improve the chances of stopping potential terrorist threats, but will encroach on privacy rights and can be too easily abused by still largely unaccountable state security agencies. After taking a deep sigh, what more is there to say or do at such a moment?

1. How about reminding ourselves why C-51 is such a bad piece of legislation. The Monitor ran a comprehensive review by lawyers Clayton Ruby and Nader Hasan on February 17, which you can read here. Craig Forcese and Kent Roach, who enriched the public understanding of C-51 in dozens of op-eds and legal analyses this year, had this article online at The Walrus as the Senate vote passed. Their conclusion:

We do not doubt the threat of terrorism -- ISIS-inspired and otherwise. Unfortunately C-51 is the legal equivalent of an unforced error, one that manages to complicate our ability to meet our security challenges, while at the same time causing unnecessary collateral damage to civil liberties that inevitably will result in Charter of Rights challenges.

2. We can ask what opposition parties think of the vote. Here are the NDP and Green Party responses from yesterday. The Liberals, who voted with the Conservatives in support of the bill in May, have promised to repeal parts of C-51 if elected in October, and 25 of the 28 senators who voted against the bill sit as independent Liberals. The three other opposition parties, including the Bloc Quebecois, voted against the bill in the House of Commons. Thomas Mulcair, leader of the Official Opposition NDP, tweeted that "Canadians can count on an #NDP government to repeal this dangerous law" if elected. Green leader Elizabeth May likewise said she was committed to repealing C-51, and that "We must build bridges of understanding with the Islamic community, improve mental health and addiction counselling, create reliable outreach programs to counter radicalization."

3. There are lots of people out there who aren't giving up. At least 255,000 have signed an OpenMedia petition asking all party leaders to commit to "Kill Bill C-51." A Forum Research poll in April found that 71 per cent of people were aware of the legislation, only 33 per cent supported it, and that disapproval was highest among Liberal voters (77 per cent) and New Democrats (75 per cent).

"It appears that the more Canadians learn about Bill C-51, the less they like it. The need for the bill is seen to be diminishing, and voters recognize some provisions may impact on their lives in ways they don't like. With an election approaching, the government would be well-advised to determine whether this bill is the hill they want to stake themselves out on," said Dr. Lorne Bozinoff, president of Forum Research, at the time.

Earlier this month, at a rally against C-51 in Toronto, lawyer Rocco Galati promised to challenge the legislation in court if it passes. (Galati, famous recently for blocking a government appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada, is also currently challenging the Bank of Canada's unwillingness to provide debt-free support for public projects, despite a legal mandate to do so.)

Stuart Trew is the editor of the Monitor, a progressive magazine published six times annually by the CCPA. Follow Stuart on Twitter @StuJT.

Photo: mtsrs/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.