The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) has announced the first round of consultations on the potential impacts of Energy East pipeline in Ontario.
Described as a 'series of interactive discussions' along the route, local residents and groups are encouraged to attend:
- Kenora, March 25
- Thunder Bay March 26
- Kapuskasing March 31
- North Bay April 2
- Timmins April 1
- Stittsville April 7
- Cornwall April 8
Discussion guides will be distributed by facilitators that are intended to provide objectives of the process, a summary of information, and encourage the views and perspectives of participants to emerge through a series of focus questions.
There will be two opportunities for written submissions, dates are pending, but the first round is likely to start in late March/April. The Council of Canadians is preparing a report that will focus on threats to water in Ontario and growing dependency on fracked gas imports.
Province-wide stakeholder forum:
I recently reported on my experience at the first stakeholder forum that brought together representatives of a variety of sectors, from industry, to agriculture to environmental organizations. Between the first and second consultations there will be another session where stakeholders can make presentations to the OEB. This session will be open to public attendance.
Facilitators hired by the OEB will compile a report summarizing the perspectives raised during the community consultations. This report, as well as the technical reports the OEB is commissioning, and the stakeholder process, will inform the second part of the consultation process. This second round of talks will seek input on a draft OEB report on the implications of the pipeline, as will the second round of written submissions.
The final outcome of this entire process is to inform the Ontario government's position for the pending National Energy Board's hearings on Energy East. The OEB itself does not have final say on the pipeline, technically this is the decision of the federal government informed by the NEB -- but I would argue it is in the hands of affected Indigenous communities with distinct legal rights and social movements with the capacity to make this project politically impossible to push through.
The significance of the OEB process is the potential to have the provincial government stand up for Ontarians interests by clearly outlining and ultimately rejecting the risks of this pipeline, this would be an important political statement helping the campaign to stop this pipeline.
The Council of Canadians will continue to participate in, and report on this process including highlighting how you can participate. You can also visit the OEB's Energy East website for more information.
ONTARIO TOUR: Energy East: Our Risk - Their Reward
From April 7-16, the Council of Canadians, with local partners, will be visiting six communities across Ontario to talk about the Energy East pipeline. The tour will feature Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow, Eriel Deranger of the Athabasca Fort Chipewyan First Nation, a local speaker, and a video presentation about the diluted bitumen pipeline spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan. We will distribute 'Our Risk, Their Reward,' window signs and encourage broader participation in the second round of OEB public consultations.
April 7 - Kenora
April 9 - Thunder Bay
April 12 - North Bay
April 13 - Ottawa
April 15 - Kemptville
April 16 - Cornwall
The admission to these events is free. To RSVP on Facebook please click here.
Ontario is a key battleground for the TransCanada's Energy East pipeline.
The conversion of an existing gas pipeline, which would transport oil across major waterways in Ontario, raises heightened concerns about the potential for a major spill or rupture.
Diluted bitumen produced in the tar sands is unlike conventional oil -- a spill would have devastating environmental impacts that are nearly impossible to clean up as seen with the Enbridge pipeline spill in Kalamazoo, Michigan.
The pipeline would result in more than 650,000 barrels per day of additional tar sands production, which means even more toxic exposure for downstream communities.
The increased production would also generate up to 32 million tonnes of carbon emissions each year -- equivalent to the annual emissions of all the cars in Ontario
The vast majority of the tar sands oil that will be pumped through the Energy East pipeline will be exported. We get all the risk, they get all the reward.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.