rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

COP 20 in Lima: Actions and finance but no action on finance

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Much has changed since I wrote my last blog. We are a quarter of the way into the negotiations here at COP 20 in Lima. As we are near the end of day 4 of the UN Climate Talks, I'd like to reflect on the past few days.

This week has provided a steep learning curve for me. On any given day, the meetings schedule alone has at least 80 events between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Additionally, we attend stakeholder meetings with representatives from the Canadian government, daily briefings, as well as additional meetings with other youth delegations and groups present in Lima.

In the daily stakeholders meetings with the Canadian government, we are consistently seeing questions around Canada's commitments for COP 21 in Paris. National commitments come largely in the form of Intended Nationally-Determined Commitments (INDCs), proposals on which are due in March 2015. When an observer asked the Canadian representative about whether or not they would make the deadline and expressed concerns that Canada would be one of the only high emitting nations in the world to miss the deadline, the representative assured us they would complete the application in the first quarter. Let's hold them to that.

An [In]equitable Climate Treaty in Paris 2015?

World leaders have been touting COP 20 as the conference to pave the road to a legally binding treaty in Paris in 2015. By Day 4, however, divisions between the Global North and Global South are making themselves known, particularly around the ADP (Ad hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform) also known as the fundamental base for negotiations to get to Paris. With many of us pushing for equity to be at the heart of next year's climate deal, it is disheartening to see the degree of division among member states. Particularly upsetting is that it is the so-called "developed" countries that seem to be actively working against equity thus far.

We are already seeing problematic comments from the EU, U.S., Australia and Switzerland -- supported by Canada and New Zealand -- on climate financing. Likewise there has been strong pushback on linking climate finance through the Green Climate Fund and the Adaptation Fund to international law. This is deeply troubling as it essentially opens the door for countries to set their own terms for funding adaptation and mitigation efforts in the Global South. 

As recently as this morning, the Australian representative said that Australia will use its own means to fund climate "aid" to so-called "developing" nations and will stand firm on its refusal to provide funding through the Green Climate Fund. This translates to less money for the most vulnerable peoples in the most vulnerable countries to protect themselves against the effects of climate change.   

Alternatively, the African Group, G77+China, and a number of countries from the Global South have spoken out strongly on the need for robust financial commitments from member states. The South African representative was particularly impressive in yesterday's finance meetings, stating the need for meaningful and inclusive conversation around climate funding. They went on to say, quite poignantly, "If people don't want to have a conversation lets just pack our bags and go home."

Corporatization of COP

Corporate presence is certainly beginning to be felt as we near the end of the first week of meetings in Lima. On Wednesday and Thursday in our daily meetings with representatives from the Canadian government, a representative from Chevron was present. TransCanada Ltd. joined the stakeholder meeting today, the representative was curious as to whether Canada was favouring a 5- or 10-year term for the treaty in Paris.  

Likewise, a representative from Shell sat on a panel put on by the IPCC hawking Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) as the wave of the future. For my friends back home in Canada, many of you will be familiar with the Boundary Dam project in Saskatchewan, which just opened for business a month ago. Using the public-private partnership model, the project gobbled up some CAD$1.4 billion to retrofit one coal plant in the province -- one. I encourage you to think of what $1.4 billion in subsidies and investments towards renewables could have done for that province. We can be sure that the corporate presence here at COP20 will continue to make itself known. There are a number of side events being put on by Shell, Chevron, the Global CCS Institute and others.  Stay tuned for more on that.

For COP 20 to be successful, we need to lay the groundwork for an equitable and just treaty that takes into account more than just climate change mitigation, which is where the current process sits. A fair treaty balances mitigation with adaptation, capacity building, technology sharing, and adequate and predictable climate finance through the Green Climate and Adaptation Funds.

Actions at COP 20

The Canadian Youth Delegation participated in two actions yesterday, as part of the Youth and Future Generations Day.

The first action highlighted the unheard voices of future generations from around the world. There were two specific demands:

  1. That agreements are in line with having net zero fossil fuel emissions worldwide by 2050.
  2. That negotiations cease to be rooted in a discount rate that values impacts in present day over impacts in the future.

The second action was organized by SustainUS, an American youth delegation here at COP 20. It was the launch of a new initiative called the Climate Test that will highlight the climate policies, projects and politicians that are helping or halting progress. 

In solidarity,

Aleah Loney and the Canadian Youth Delegation

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.