rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The beginning of the end for Keystone XL

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Obama sets out his climate test for Keystone XL

On a sweltering hot day in July of 2013, President Obama made a historic speech on climate change at Georgetown University. Speaking to a crowd of students, he warned that the warming of our planet would have disastrous consequences if we failed to act. Unveiling his sweeping new national climate action plan, he said, "I refuse to condemn your generation and future generations to a planet that’s beyond fixing."

In his speech, Obama also use his speech to lay out his conditions for the approval of Keystone XL: "The net effects of the pipeline's impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward."

Henceforth, this has been known as Obama's climate test for Keystone XL. If Keystone significantly exacerbates climate pollution, it can’t be approved.  

Well today the EPA released to the State Department its damning final comments on the climate impact of Keystone XL. The agency concluded that Keystone XL would "significantly increase" the greenhouse-gas emissions from the expansion of the tar sands.

Over the 50-year lifetime of the pipeline, the project could directly contribute to releasing as much as 1.37 billion more tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. That’s equivalent to putting 5.7 million new cars on the road.

In other words, the EPA just told Obama that he must reject Keystone XL.

To experts, it's been clear for a long time that Keystone would have a massive impact on the climate. But in the media, it’s been a confusing issue. 

A year ago, when the State Department released its final report on the likely impacts of the project, TransCanada took advantage of the fact that few people had either the time or inclination to read the massive eight-volume report, and played down the report’s findings. Unfortunately, some media outlets repeated TransCanada’s spin -- that the review of Keystone had suggested there would be minimal impacts.   

But, the EPA -- like anyone else who has actually read the key sections – noticed the report contained a clear warning that with even slightly lower oil prices, the climate impact of Keystone would rise dramatically: “The Final SETS concluded that at sustained oil prices of $65 to $75 per barrel, the higher transportation costs of shipment by rail "could have a substantial impact on oil sands production levels -- possibly in excess of the capacity of the proposed project."

That means Keystone XL would be directly responsible for dramatically increased tar sands production, because shipping the oil by rail would be far too expensive an alternative. Without the pipeline, the oil and the associated carbon pollution would stay safely in the ground.  With prices for oil dropping below $50 per barrel, this scenario has come true, and then some.

The above logic is the same reason that TransCanada's other mega tar sands pipeline proposal, Energy East will also have a disastrous impact for our climate. Both pipelines would directly facilitate reckless expansion of the tar sands, locking us into rising carbon pollution for decades to come.

President Obama is now reaching the end of the road on Keystone XL. With all of the various agencies and departments having now weighed in, we can only wait for a full rejection from the President. And that day can't come soon enough.  


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.