rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Why Margaret Wente still has a job at The Globe and Mail

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

I have never met or spoken to David Walmsley, who is editor of The Globe and Mail. But in many ways I admire the way he has set his paper's course in what are troubled times for the newspaper industry.

Among other things, he has invested heavily in investigative journalism, and embarked on a campaign to document the plight of Canadian victims of thalidomide (who have not been adequately compensated). Another campaign uncovered new facts about the tragedy of missing and murdered Aboriginal women.

This has paid off in industry accolades. Under his leadership, the Globe leads all other news organizations with 19 nominations for this year's National Newspaper Awards. The previous year, it won in five categories (no other media organization won more than two).

That is why it's hard to understand his clumsy ethical tap-dance over allegations that his most celebrated columnist, Margaret Wente, may be a plagiarist.

Since new evidence was unearthed by blogger Carol Waino more than two weeks ago, Walmsley has been largely silent. But he finally went on the record with J-source.

What Wente did, he said, was not plagiarism.

No? Well, it sure seems to me that it was, and it sure seems that way to Waino, who on her blog Media Culpa gives numerous examples of Wente's words and ideas echoing or copying those of other writers. The New York Times and The Atlantic magazine seem to be Wente's favourite poaching grounds, if you can believe it. Most shoplifters at least take the precaution of lifting from the back shelves, not the front counter.

The Globe's only problem with Wente, Walmsley told J-source, was sloppy standards.

He didn't specify just what type of standards she was sloppy about. Originality, perhaps? Actually interviewing the people she quotes? Actually reading the books she critiques? We're not told. But Walmsley seems happy enough paying a large salary to a columnist who is habitually sloppy.

OK, wait, but he was just warming up.

Then he more or less said he had no idea what plagiarism is in a journalistic context. "Where we have a problem is that people are still feeling that it is plagiarism," he told J-source. "I think that's partly because we don't have an industry-accepted standard of what plagiarism is in the news business."

Well, his own newspaper happens to have an accepted standard for plagiarism. Perhaps he should read it sometime. According to the Globe's Editorial Code of Conduct:

"It is unacceptable to represent another person's work as your own. Excerpts from other people's prose must be attributed so as to avoid even a suspicion of copying. Although it is sometimes reasonable to adopt a few words without attribution (in a technical definition, for example), careful judgment is required. When in doubt, consult a senior editor. Any extensive unacknowledged use of another's words, structure or ideas may constitute plagiarism. Exception: Background from previously published Globe staff and news-service items may be recycled, verbatim or otherwise, without credit, although you should not borrow someone's distinctive prose style in doing so."

What's not clear about that? Wente writes for the Globe and the Globe has a policy. Did she violate it or not? Has she ever consulted with a senior editor about her proclivity for relying so heavily on the words and thoughts of others?

Judge for yourself. Here is just one of the many examples that Waino documents on her blog.

On July 1, 2012, Clive Crook wrote in The Atlantic that "racial disparities... are narrowing... class disparities... are widening dramatically. The prosperous and the poor, regardless of race, are living in increasingly separate worlds."

Two weeks later, on July 14, 2012, Wente wrote: "Racial disparities are narrowing, but class disparities are widening dramatically. The prosperous and the poor, regardless of race, are increasingly segregated from each other."

Not plagiarism, Mr. Walmsley?

Even more amazing, the editor of Canada's most prestigious newspaper was asked by J-source what the solution is. Walmsley said that for now, he's open to any suggestion for how to improve standards in the newsroom. "If someone can come up with a) an agreed standard and b) how you actually place that pre-publication, I'm all ears."

Hold on a moment here. Instead of taking responsibility for his own problem and solving it, Walmsley is inviting the public to come up with standards? He's crowdsourcing a way to rein in Wente? Is that what the man is saying?

Walmsley is not a stupid man, despite what you may think. As a former newsroom manager myself, I recognize that tap-dance he's doing. It's the kind of weird shuffle you have to do in public when your boss the publisher tells you to eat it and make this go away.

Wente still has a job because she speaks to the one percent. She personifies the Globe's brand.

Walmsley is just her delivery boy.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.