rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Lack of ambition before Paris Climate Conference

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Syncrude operations at the Alberta tar sands. Photo by Sara Stratton

I was surprised by media reports that pre-Paris national pledges of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reductions could keep temperature increases to around 2.7 degrees Celsius by 2100. So I investigated.

It turns out that the 2.7 degrees Celsius figure was indeed used in a carefully qualified news release from the UN climate change secretariat. But the danger of reporting this number is that it implies that the world is getting close to meeting the official target of keeping temperature rises near 2 degrees Celsius.

In fact this is a dubious projection that is based on some very shaky assumptions. First it assumes that every country will achieve the targets it has set for the years 2020 to 2030. Canada's failure to live up to its commitments under the 1997 Kyoto accord, or to put in place measures that could meet its current pledge, demonstrates why we should be skeptical.

Second, the 2.7 degrees Celsius projection assumes countries will continue reducing GHG emissions after 2030 at the same rate as the previous decade. A more realistic assessment by Climate Interactive is that an agreement in Paris based on implementing the pledges now on the table would lead to an increase in global temperatures of 3.5 degrees Celsius. This is just one degree less than the 4.5 degrees Celsius rise that would occur under a business-as-usual scenario.

Third, the secretariat's projection does not take into account feedback mechanisms, such as the release of methane due to the melting of Arctic permafrost. Methane is a greenhouse gas 85 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. As I have previously documented, feedback effects from thawing permafrost and methane hydrates could accelerate climate change dramatically leading to conditions that would not support life on Earth as we know it.

Accordingly Giza Gaspar-Martins, an Angolan diplomat speaking for 48 of the poorest and most vulnerable countries, has criticized the current pledges as lacking ambition. He called for them to be adjusted to deliver results before 2020 and to be renewed every five years lest "we all face a grim and uncertain future." Repeating warnings that even two degrees of warming will cause oceans to rise enough to submerge small island states, Gaspar-Martins emphasized the call from the least developed countries to adopt a more ambitious target of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

An analysis by Climate Action Tracker confirms that changes to actual government policies are much more important than their pledges. It states that there is only a 50 per cent chance of holding temperature increases to 2.7 degrees Celsius if all pledges are kept. More importantly, under current policies temperatures are likely to rise to 3.6 degrees Celsius or higher by 2100.

Maxime Combes, a member of the international civil society coalition Climate Justice Now, spoke at the November 8 pre-conference ministerial meeting attended by Canada's Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Catherine McKenna. Combes pointed out that the pledges made to date "lead to at least 10 per cent more emissions in 2030 compared to today, while the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has shown that they should be reduced by almost 70 per cent by 2050. This is not acceptable. … Higher emissions in the early years will necessitate greater and more costly emission reductions later on in order to keep global warming under 2 degrees Celsius (or under 1.5 degrees Celsius)."

John Dillon, Ecological Economy Program Coordinator, KAIROS Canada

Photo Credit: Sara Stratton.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.