Finally we have movement in the long and drawn-out voter suppression investigation.
A junior Conservative staffer on the 2011 federal campaign in the Guelph riding has been charged with attempting to prevent someone from voting, an offence under the Canada Elections Act.
The staffer's name is Michael Sona.
He is alleged to have committed his offence by ordering automated -- or "robo" -- calls, which told carefully selected “non-Conservative” voters, falsely, that polling stations had been moved.
The robocalls purported to come from Elections Canada, also a falsehood; but not, curiously, against the law, as it now stands. One of the changes to the law the Chief Electoral Officer, Marc Mayrand, has proposed would make it a crime to impersonate an Elections Canada official.
One aspect of the current case that stands out is how much non-cooperation Elections Canada investigators have faced.
A number of key players -- including Sona, himself, and the Guelph Conservative campaign manager (who is now safely out of the country) -- have refused to speak with investigators. Another legislative change Mayrand is urging on the government would remedy that obstacle. It would give Elections Canada the authority to compel people who have potentially valuable information to answer investigators' questions.
When asked whether his package of proposed legislative changes would cost money, Mayrand pointed out that if the investigators now had the powers he proposes the current investigation would, in fact, be a lot less expensive.
As for Sona, he claims he did not, personally, have the resources necessary to commit the crime of which he is accused.
For one thing, he claims he did not have access to the National Conservative Party headquarters' voter database. To engineer a robocall that targeted identified non-Conservative voters one would need access to that database.
There is much speculation that Elections Canada is laying this single charge against Sona in the hope that it will encourage him to be a bit more forthcoming. The big question is, if he, Sona, did not have the capacity to carry out the Guelph robocall caper, who did?
Sona's lawyer broadly hinted that his client has much damaging information to share about the full extent of what happened in 2011. He dropped that hint when he said the only way to get at the full truth would be "a full, public inquiry." The clear implication is that the full scope of the "truth" spreads way beyond whatever his hapless client might have done.
We will definitely not be getting that inquiry from the Harper government.
For the time being, the closest we'll get to hearing, in public, from anyone involved in the 2011 campaign's putative voter suppression activities will be at Sona's trial, which is due to start on May 3.
As we wait for that, Elections Canada says it is continuing its investigation.
As well, Federal Court Judge Richard Mosley is still considering the suit brought by six Canadians who seek to have the 2011 election results in their ridings overturned because of the widespread alleged voter suppression tactics.
At the conclusion of that trial, late last year, Mosely said he would render his judgment as quickly as possible, but that it would inevitably take some time. More than three months have now elapsed since then.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.