rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Will the Quebec election mean the end of asbestos mining and exports?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

The outgoing Charest government in Quebec received a lot of flack over the summer for offering a $58-million loan to an industry that was on its last breath — the mining and export of asbestos. (Recriminations came from international labour and health groups, editorials in most major Canadian papers, and even the Fraser Institute — see links below.) But now that the PQ will be taking over the reins in the National Assembly there may be no resuscitation for the Jeffrey Mine.

In a historic shift, three of the four parties that elected members to the National Assembly — including the victorious PQ — pledged to end the province's long-standing and myopic support of the toxic industry. The Liberals were the holdouts. Prior to the election the CBC quoted Premier-to-be Pauline Marois as saying that asbestos is "an industry from another era" and relinquishing it is "the path forward that now seems to be clearing." The story notes that the PQ, CAQ, and Quebec Solidaire received kudos from the Canadian Cancer Society for their positions.

It might come as a surprise to many that the right “path” on asbestos is only just opening for the PQ or that the Liberals would consider re-opening asbestos mines, let alone providing a generous loan. But staunch support in Quebec for the asbestos mines in the Eastern Townships has been an obstacle for health and social justice activists trying to curtail the export of the harmful mineral to India, Thailand, and other countries in the Global South. The support has stemmed in part from a historic legacy and part from political opportunism.

The modern Quebec labour movement was born from strikes at the asbestos mines so until recently many progressive individuals and organizations have found it difficult to speak out on the matter. But at last the contradictions seem to have overcome the tendency to support or stay silent about the industry. The fact that the miners at the other closed asbestos mine in Thetford had to make considerable concessions on pay and benefits (putting them far below industry standards) may have helped tip the balance.

On the political front, the mines are located is a swing riding, so governments and hopeful political parties have pandered to the local desire to maintain jobs in the mines. In this week’s election the Liberals kept the riding by just a few hundred votes. It is now represented by the daughter of the former Member of the National Assembly, who announced the controversial loan to the Jeffrey Mine shortly before retiring in July.

Long before scientists declared the “Death of Evidence” in federal policy and budget making, federal governments (Conservatives and before them Liberals) ignored the overwhelming science on the hazards of asbestos, providing direct support to the industry’s lobbying organization, the Chrysotile Institute (originally the Asbestos Institute), and downplaying the hazards in international arenas. In 2011 the Conservative government led a successful effort to keep chrysotile asbestos from being listed on the Rotterdam convention – which would have required the mineral to be labeled as hazardous when exported.

The shift in the political support for asbestos mining in Quebec may be part natural evolution and the inevitable ripening of uncomfortable contradictions – but much credit must also be given to those who have organized and campaigned on the issue. They have been successful at keeping the issue in the media, highlighting international reactions in Quebec, and holding the credible science of organizations like the WHO over the bunk science of industry funded researchers and lobbyists. Congratulations to the other Ban Asbestos Canada coalition members, Right On Canada and especially to Kathleen Ruff — organizer, researcher, and author of numerous op-ed pieces as well as of the influential report Exporting Harm: How Canada Markets Asbestos to the Developing World.

Of course the work of activists is never truly done. While we may have made important milestones in curtailing the export of asbestos there is still much work needed to deal with the legacy of past asbestos mining and its widespread use. The case of former asbestos miners in BC recently covered by CBC’s the National is a case in point.

Links to selected media coverage from the past 3 months (for a more comprehensive listings follow these links for Canadian coverage and international stories):

The Globe and Mail: Quebec should let asbestos industry die

Montreal Gazette - Epidemiologists oppose reopening asbestos mine

National Post: Thailand’s move to ban asbestos leaves Quebec looking foolish

Montreal Gazette: Charest government may have miscalculated announcement to reopen Jeffrey Asbestos Mine with a $58-million loan

Fraser Institute: With latest bailout, Quebec government subsidizes products hazardous to human health

National Post: Saying No to Canada's Asbestos

Sarnia Observer: Scientists condemn Canadian asbestos exports

Australia Broadcasting Corporation: Calls for Canada to ban asbestos exports to India

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.