rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Christy Clark is the kind of feminist that makes women's lives worse

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Image: Flickr/bcgovphotos

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

In honour of International Women's Day, Pamela Martin published a piece lauding Christy Clark for, you guessed it, her womanhood. "Christy Clark has never been afraid of shattering glass ceilings" the headline announced. It's yet another reminder to feminists everywhere that there is nothing neoliberalism won't co-opt.

Martin, as reported by the Times Colonist in 2013, "took a leave from her taxpayer-paid government job in order to campaign for Clark during the May provincial election. She hosted a quasi-news broadcast of major Liberal announcements on YouTube and was rewarded with a job as director of political engagement at 130K a year and moved to the Liberal party itself."

We should not be surprised that the Liberal party's outreach director is heaping praise on its leader. Pamela Martin would have us believe that Clark is an idealist activist who single-handedly revived the B.C. Liberal Party and "shatters glass ceilings." Not even close. Instead, the premier is crawling through a Clark-shaped hole and leaving women stranded below.

On Sunday, Clark becomes Canada's longest serving woman premier. But only the most shallow of feminists would think her impact, including her impact as a woman, ends here. Clark's government has destroyed social services for the poor and has made B.C.'s child poverty rate the worst in the country.  Based on her governing record, her main concerns are corporate profitability and protecting elite interests.

This is one of the dangers of liberal feminism. What is the point of feminism when we applaud rich white women for cutting the benefits of the poor? Why do we care that Clark "moved heaven and earth" to institute Pink Shirt Day when she and her colleagues in the Legislature routinely reveal themselves to be the worst kind of smug, entitled bullies?

The mistake of liberal feminism is to allow the category of "woman" to trump the category of "elite." Highly paid CEOs, and high-powered women of the political class rarely have much in common with the other 99 per cent of the population. On one hand, we can celebrate the normally mundane fact that Christy Clark brought her infant son to the legislature, but on the other, she got there by selling out other women, consistently and with a smile.

What is a gal to do?

The first woman who gave birth as a sitting member of Cabinet was Pauline Marois. Despite her unceremonious exit from the leadership of the Parti Québécois, at least Québec's $5-per-day child-care program was her main legacy. This program allowed thousands of women to go back to work and vastly expanded the public child-care system in Québec.

It's currently being dis-man-tled by Liberal premier Philippe Couillard.

Unlike Marois, the economic policies of the Clark government have done incalculably more damage to the women of British Columbia than any small advances she might claim around motherhood. Racialized women, Indigenous women, queer kids, girls and boys in state care, parents struggling to pay for childcare: none of them are better off because of Clark's womanhood. Clark's victory in sliding through the cracks of the glass ceiling mean nothing to them.

With an election coming up and the Liberals down in the polls, this piece by Pamela Martin is a test balloon to see how far they can get neutralizing criticism with accusations of sexism. Sarah Palin and her campaign deployed this tactic successfully at first, before it became clear that Palin couldn't sustain the effort it took to project credibility. The Clinton campaign in the American primary has been relying heavily on this technique to avoid questions about support for mass incarceration and regime change in other countries. Clark's media savvy is her most valuable asset: it‘s been enough to prevent a full-scale rebellion which by any rights should have occurred years ago.

The longest-serving female premier in Canadian history will end up with the same reputation as Margaret Thatcher. The real sexism here is employed by the Christy Clark government against the women of British Columbia. Sexism doesn't exist in a vacuum. Sexism can't flow uphill. Only the most self-interested would claim that the wealth and whiteness of a person doesn't influence how they are treated vis à vis their gender. It's self-evident. So why are we not capable of challenging Christy Clark and Suzanne Anton and these women who are waging a war on the poor in British Columbia?

What we should watch out for is the sexism the B.C. Liberal campaign is going to be slinging fast and hot during the next year. A politician who disrespects the land, water and air: the basic sources of life, can never be a feminist.

Despite the admiration that Martin has for her boss, no amount of Liberal feminism will hide the deep wounds that Clark and her cronies have inflicted.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Image: Flickr/bcgovphotos

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.