rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

How driverless cars stand to disrupt Nova Scotia's highway mega-projects

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: Doug Kerr/flickr

On Friday, the government issued a request for proposals for a $1.5-million study to figure out whether to twin eight sections of 100-series highways and -- as importantly -- how to raise the $1.5 billion needed to complete what Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal Minister Geoff MacLellan calls a "once-in-a-generation set of mega-projects."

Part of me thinks this is long overdue.

That's the part of me that drives Highway 103 often enough to have passed -- more than once -- within minutes of fatal car crashes. In the past decade, 28 people died in collisions along this mostly un-twinned major highway between Halifax and Yarmouth, making it one of the most deadly in the country.

In 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper described upgrading the 101 as "the priority the province and ourselves have identified." In 2013, MacLellan declared "we're looking forward to working with our federal counterparts to make sure we get a commitment and let's get working."

Yes, let's.


Another part of me wonders whether these sort of "generational" highway mega-projects aren't already past their best-before dates.

That's the part of me that's become fascinated by autonomous vehicles (AVs), also known as driverless cars, also known as the future.

According to a recent report from the Conference Board of Canada, major automakers will be selling fully autonomous cars by 2025.

That will change… everything.

"Self-driving cars could free up driving time, significantly reduce the number of car accidents, minimize road congestion and reduce the amount of fuel that we consume." No wonder the Conference Board calls AVs the "next disruptive technology."

Because AVs are much safer and more efficient drivers than we are, a KPMG study also suggested "traffic capacity will increase exponentially without building additional lanes or roadways… It may even be possible to convert existing vehicle infrastructure to bicycle or pedestrian uses."

We won't need more lanes to carry more traffic -- or to make us safer.

Given that MacLellan's mega-projects will probably take five years to green light, a decade to build and be designed to last another 30 years, shouldn't we be asking ourselves -- first -- what kind of highways we'll really need in 30 years? We need to plan for the future, rather than the past.

This article first appeared in Stephen Kimber's Halifax Metro column.

Photo: Doug Kerr/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.