Give peace a seat at cabinet table

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Duelling was once regarded as an entirely appropriate way for two gentlemen to resolve a dispute.

Today, a gentleman challenging another to a duel would be regarded as peculiar. Duels have become obsolete in the civilized world.

Could war also become an outdated method of conflict resolution -- particularly as we enter an era of intensified global conflict over dwindling resources?

This compelling question lies behind an international grassroots movement that got a boost last week when NDP MP Bill Siksay and Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis introduced a private member's bill in Parliament calling for the creation of a federal Department of Peace, with a seat at the cabinet table.

Of course, private member's bills rarely pass, especially when, like this one, they challenge the orthodoxy of the military-industrial-academic establishment.

A Department of Peace may sound mushy and soft-hearted, but it's actually a deeply, subtly revolutionary idea, in that it threatens to undermine the war-oriented mindset that dominates our culture.

The goal of making war obsolete doesn't rely on any dewy-eyed notions about the possibilities of human improvement. Gentlemen no longer duel -- not because men today are more kindly or sensitive than men were in the past, but because duelling has become socially unacceptable.

The same is true of slavery. Once a widely accepted practice, slavery now lacks legitimacy throughout the civilized world. With the rise of a strong abolitionist movement, a practice that had been regarded for centuries as a natural form of human behaviour came to be seen as uncivilized, immoral and repugnant.

We're taught to believe that war is different, however, that it's inevitable, given the human tendency for aggression. But war isn't just an expression of human aggression. It's also an institution that requires social approval and support.

Western Europe is a striking example of what happens when that social approval is withdrawn. After centuries of constant war against each other, the people of western Europe were profoundly changed by the bloodbath of World War II, which left them no longer willing to tolerate war as a means of resolving their differences.

Today, a politician in Germany, France or Britain advocating war against another western European nation would be regarded as unsophisticated, unbalanced -- even ridiculous.

Canada could sorely use a Department of Peace.

In recent years, we've deviated sharply from our strong peacekeeping tradition; our troop contributions to UN missions now rank below those of tiny nations like Benin, Togo and Fiji. Stephen Harper's Conservatives have instead cultivated a culture of war, projecting a hyper-muscular image abroad while committing a massive $490 billion to military spending over the next 20 years -- even though we're already the sixth biggest military spender in NATO.

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff suffers from the same warlike mentality. In an April 2004 TV interview, while he was a professor of "human rights" at Harvard, Ignatieff endorsed targeted assassinations. He also keenly supported George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq -- a position he now regrets, but only because that war turned out badly.

Both Harper and Ignatieff could be said to belong to the "warrior class" -- the political, corporate and military elite that is closely tied to the highly profitable industry of war.

No one expects them to abandon their pro-war stance -- at least not until a profound change in public attitudes leaves them looking as foolish as two investment bankers counting their paces before shooting it out on Bay Street.

Linda McQuaig is author of It's the Crude, Dude: War, Big Oil and the Fight for the Planet.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.