The Iowa fiasco rings the death knell of a failed 50-year experiment

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Image: Ellen Macdonald/Flickr

The Iowa caucuses are monumentally important in the selection of presidential candidates in the United States. The question we have to ask is, Why? As this goes to press, only partial results have been released so far by the Iowa Democratic party. Most blame falls on the Iowa Democratic party and a software company called Shadow. Shadow made the disastrous app that failed to provide the promised instantaneous caucus results. Then, the party's backup system, a tried-and-true phone bank that has served the caucus process for half a century, proved to be insufficient for the volume of precincts desperately trying to call in their results.

Technical snafus notwithstanding, the fundamental question is why two almost entirely white states -- Iowa, along with New Hampshire with its first-in-the-nation primary status -- are allowed to have such a disproportionate influence over who the two major parties nominate for president.

The Democracy Now! news hour sparked the most recent incarnation of this debate during a presidential forum on environmental justice we co-hosted, held last November at South Carolina State University, an HBCU (historically Black college or university) in Orangeburg, S.C. Here is the exchange that was the first time a major 2020 Democratic candidate was asked to comment on the nomination processes' racial disparity:

AMY GOODMAN: Senator Warren … speaking about racial injustice, do you think the order of the primary states should change? You have Iowa and New Hampshire --

SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN: Wait, let me make -- let me just -- before you finish, are you actually going to ask me to sit here and criticize Iowa and New Hampshire?

GOODMAN: No, I'm asking about the order.

WARREN: No, that is what Iowa and New Hampshire are all about.

GOODMAN: But let me just ask. They're two of the whitest states in the country, and then we move to South Carolina with a very significant population of people of colour, and it means the candidates spend so much of their time catering to those first two states. Overall, do you think that should change?

WARREN: Look, I'm just a player in the game on this one.

Warren was visibly irritated by the question as she left the stage. Later, MSNBC played our exchange with Warren for then-Democratic presidential hopeful Julian Castro. "Our country has changed a lot in those 50 years … Demographically, it is not reflective of the United States as a whole, certainly not of the Democratic party," Castro replied. "I don't believe that forever we should be married to Iowa and New Hampshire going first."

Gilberto Hinojosa, chair of the Texas Democratic party, appeared on Democracy Now! not long after Warren's dismissal of the issue. "Texas is the second-largest state in the country, probably the most diverse state in the country. Forty per cent of the population in the state is Hispanic. Fifteen per cent is either African-American or Asian-American. We are a majority-minority state, as is California and New Mexico," Hinojosa said. "I'm from the Rio Grande Valley of Texas. There's about 1.4 million people that live in the Rio Grande Valley, about 90 percent Latino. It's as if we would have our primary in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas and have candidates spending three months there, continuously going to barbecues and different events that were being sponsored by the local elected officials. Nobody would think that would be representative."

What would be representative? According to the Pew Research Center, the Democratic party is now more than 40 per cent nonwhite. Compare that with Iowa, which is more than 90 per cent white, and New Hampshire at 93 per cent white, according to the U.S. census as of 2018. One can anecdotally verify these numbers by viewing video of just about any campaign event in either state, as the camera pans across a sea of white faces.

Pew also notes that post-millennials, those born between 1997-2012, will be the most racially diverse generation in U.S. history. According to figures recently released by the U.S. census, while Iowa's population increased marginally, the state actually lost residents under 18. New Hampshire's decline in young people was even more pronounced. Clearly, as these two states become older and whiter, they become decreasingly representative of the Democratic party.

"Iowa's function in the nomination process is to responsibly winnow the field," Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Art Cullen, editor of The Storm Lake Times in Iowa, wrote this week, adding, "nobody has any clue who will win our two-year-long parlor game."

Choosing the nominee to challenge the impeached-yet-acquitted incumbent president, Donald Trump, is no game. There is strength in diversity, and it is time for the Democratic party to abandon its failed, 50-year experiment with the first-in-the-nation caucus and primary in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Amy Goodman is the host of Democracy Now!, a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 1,300 stations. She is the co-author, with Denis Moynihan, of The Silenced Majority, a New York Times bestseller. This column originally appeared on Democracy Now!

Image: Ellen Macdonald/Flickr

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.