President George W. Bushs first nine months in office were marked by an alarming hostility toward the rest of the world. He sneered at the United Nations, and rejected international treaties on global warming, biological weapons, and the establishment of an international court.
Then came September 11, and along with it a new openness in the Bush administrations approach to other nations. Overtures were made to Europe, Indonesia, Russia and Pakistan.
The White House began receiving foreign heads of state. Britains Prime Minister Tony Blair was hailed as a great friend of America. Canadas troops were put under U.S. command. The war against terrorism, it was said, was a global one.
Now, it seems, all that has changed. The first signs that the Bush administration was back to its old tricks? Its withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, its reluctance to provide financial aid in the rebuilding of Afghanistan, and its defiance of the Geneva Conventions on prisoners of war.
Now, with the Taliban vanquished, Washington has announced it still isnt ready to give up the fight, with a proposed expansion of the war on terror to the axis of evil otherwise known as North Korea, Iran and Iraq.
And the rest of the world, including some of America's closest allies and partners, is furious. French Foreign Minister Hubert VÃ©drine has called Washingtons approach simplistic. European Union Foreign Affairs Minister Christopher Patten wrote in The Financial Times that Americas victory in Afghanistan had reinforced the dangerous belief that the projection of military power is the only basis of true security.
Joschka Fischer, Germanys Foreign Affairs Minister, said, the international coalition against terror does not provide a basis for doing just anything against anybody and certainly not by going it alone. Chinese leaders have threatened serious consequences if the U.S. attacks Iraq, and South Korea is furious over North Koreas inclusion on the evil list, fearing that it has compromised years of that nations diplomatic overtures to its isolationist northern neighbour.
And in a joint media briefing last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Jean ChrÃ©tien said unilateral action in Iraq will lead nowhere, with the Prime Minister adding that Canada is not implicated in any plans for Iraq or for other nations.
So, what do you do when your friends and supporters say, Enough is enough, this is no longer the appropriate approach to terrorism? Do you listen to their counsel? Do you smooth ruffled feathers, and seek co-operation? Do you step back and receive direction from the United Nations?
Not if youre Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in a speech over the weekend that America has friends and allies in this cause, but only we can lead it. Only we can rally the world in a task of this complexity against an enemy so elusive and so resourceful. The United States and only the United States can see this effort through to victory.
And not if youre President George W. Bush, who, also over the weekend, stated that the U.S. would not blink in its fight against terrorism, and added that Canada stands with America on this incredibly important crusade to defend freedom. (This despite the fact that National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice called up the Prime Ministers foreign affairs adviser for a clarification of ChrÃ©tiens remarks.)
Washingtons message and tone seem purposely antagonistic. As New York Times reporter David Sanger noted this past weekend, in appearances across the country, (Bush) has built on the axis of evil phraseology of his State of the Union address, knowing full well that each repetition irritates and divides the countries he once hailed as his great coalition partners.
Since September 11, some Americans have, with regard to Muslims in the Middle East, rather naively wondered, why do they hate us so much? As allies in Europe, Asia and North America have once again been alienated by Washington, they may now wonder why the rest of the world dislikes them, too.
In a nutshell: for their governments arrogance and presumptuousness, for its isolationism and its dangerous foreign policy, for its refusal to compromise or co-operate, for its expansion of military action despite the rest of the worlds advice and interests.
The real question that should be asked now, however, is not why the rest of world doesnt like or doesnt support America, but rather why does America care so little about the rest of the world?
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.