Early in Russiaās brutal assault on Ukraine, there was much talk about the need to humiliate Russia. āHumiliation is the only way to end the Russo-Ukrainian War and give Russia a chance of returning to civilization,ā wrote an academic. I was fretting over this to a friend, who said, āDonāt you want Russia to be humiliated?ā To my surprise, I heard myself say, āI want all aggressors to be humiliated. Russia, the U.S., China ā¦ā
Iād expected Iād say something about humiliation making it harder to end the war, or that itād only advance U.S. goals. Instead, I blurted a pox on them all.
I felt comparably perplexed listening to UN ambassador Bob Raeās year-end interviews. One expects a bit more than boilerplate from Rae and he tries to deliver, if not always successfully.
Globe reporter Shannon Proudfoot called Rae an adult among toddlers at the UN because he claims Canadaās role is ājust to tell the truth.ā So, on Iran, he says: āYouāre killing people, youāre throwing people in jail and torturing them.ā
Yet he mentions nothing about the U.S. having green-lighted coups and trained torturers throughout Latin America. He told another Globe reporter that Ukraine āaffected me on a deep, emotional level.ā But heās selectively affected; he talks this way about Russian atrocities, not how the U.S. erased Fallujah; bombed Libya, creating chaos; or blockaded Iraq so 500,000 kids likely died.
The biggest distortions on our side are always about the United States. Russia has an ugly record of aggression and China a smaller one but the U.S. is unique, at least postwar, for invasions and their kin, coups. Guatemala, Iran, Lebanon, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Panama, Chile, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya ā the U.S. cited noble motives for each, but so does every aggressor. You can tell the U.S. is lying ā as Rae said referring exclusively to Russia ā because their lips move.
I know it sounds like Iām whining about hypocrisy, but thatās not it. Honestly. Hypocrisy drives people nuts, but you can live with it, if it remains mere bluster. Itās the real world consequences that smart. So Saudi aggression against Yemen, unlike Russiaās against Ukraine, goes uncriticized by our side, though itās now the worldās worst humanitarian disaster.
Israel is allowed a nuclear arsenal but Iran isnāt, so the Mideast remains the worldās worst nuclear tinderbox. Cubaās too close to the U.S. to be left in peace but China isnāt allowed similar claims over Taiwan, another offshore island. Two-faced foreign policy B.S. doesnāt create these travesties, but it surely helps them thrive.
People suffer and die, resources are diverted from areas like health, and cooperation among major powers on climate is undermined. Resentment builds and convulsions eventually occur, like 9-11, or the rise of ISIS after U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.
So is it hopeless? No. In Ukraineās case, there have been interesting reactions. Former colonies like India or Indonesia, and even Saudi Arabia ā a shocker ā havenāt followed the U.S. on isolating Russia, though they all reject the invasion. They recognize B.S. and propaganda and donāt just dive in, as we tend to.
I acknowledge thereās no easy route for Canada on this. We arenāt India or Indonesia and we canāt afford to become Cuba. But we, and ambassador Bob, could at least give some sign of struggling with the issues and not just autonomically saluting the U.S. position. In the Vietnam era, PM Lester Pearson tried clumsily to straddle both sides of the raging conflict over that U.S. invasion and actually got himself throttled by president Lyndon Johnson on the White House porch for it. Yet, I think people elsewhere at least recognized his effort.
Thereās a nice moment in the latest episode of 1923, the Yellowstone spinoff. Rancher Jacob Dutton (Harrison Ford) explains that all human history is about letting others take whatās yours, or destroying them. For those of us who arenāt rancher barons or nuclear superpowers, there ought to be another way.
This column originally appeared in the Toronto Star.