This might sound a little crazy, but I love Jim Flaherty. I love him for speaking his mind and I love him for sticking to his ill-advised principles. Every time he opens his mouth I feel a thrill of anticipation. What could it possibly be now? I wonder, how far can one man go?
But even after announcing plans to ban teachers strikes, throw homeless people in prison, lay off civil servants, kick people off welfare after two years, halt the expansion of abortion clinics, sell off TVO, curb the political power of unions and cut taxes despite a looming deficit of $3-billion to $5-billion, Jim Flaherty hasnt disappointed me yet.
At a time when all political wisdom suggests making nice and straddling the fence, Flaherty has decided to distinguish himself as the most right of the five candidates vying for provincial leadership.
There is nothing indirect or subtle about the man. If hes elected, expect tax cuts and reduced spending; expect all the draconian and anti-democratic policies hes been all too happy to discuss.
Expect him to sell off the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO), a misguided quick-fix solution to the deficit that would only serve to eliminate a profitable revenue source for the province.
Expect more of what hes already accomplished in his political career to date: As attorney general he instituted anti-squeegee legislation and as finance minister he offered tax credits for private schools while slashing funding for public education.
Flahertys supporters are single-issue voters, anti-abortion activists, the religious right and proponents of private education. Hes a little too fringe to be broadly palatable in Ontario and thats why I love Jim Flaherty the most because if he wins the Conservative leadership race, the Tories are unlikely to win the next provincial election.
And it could happen. Though Flaherty isnt favoured in the polls, the leader will be decided in a one-member, one-vote race. If he manages to rally enough members with a private education/anti-abortion/anti-homeless/anti-everything axe to grind, he has a real shot at leadership.
By contrast, opponent Ernie Eves, the former finance minister who is widely considered the front-runner, appears positively reasonable, if plenty vague, in his vision and platform. Flaherty has called Eves a pale pink imitation of (Liberal Leader) Dalton McGuinty, (this despite Eves all-season George Hamilton tan).
Eves and his handlers certainly are cultivating Eves image as a more centrist, gentler Conservative, and his winnability in the provincial election in a year and a half is widely acknowledged.
Hes the Progressive Conservative Partys dream come true. Hes Mike Harris in a better suit and, more importantly, hes Mike Harris without the baggage of labour unrest, teacher strikes, Walkerton and Dudley George. And when Mike Harris leaves, the party doesnt have to change, because Harris will take much of that baggage along with him.
Eves has called himself Dalton McGuintys worst nightmare and he probably is. The popular Eves could draw small-c conservative Liberal voters to the PC party in the next election, giving the already battered province its third consecutive Conservative government. And that definitely makes Eves the provinces worst nightmare, because while he might not be Mike Harris, neither is he a radical departure.
While in office, Eves was involved in key decisions to cut taxes in order to balance the budget. The short-term success of this strategy has had long-term disastrous results in the form of a huge deficit and a revenue crisis.
According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, almost seven years of tax cuts (in Ontario) have reduced annual personal income tax revenue by $9.5-billion. Corporate tax cuts have cost the revenue base an additional $2.6-billion. And thanks to the fact that the first four years of tax cuts were delivered while the province was running a deficit, the cost of carrying the debt incurred to finance the tax cuts now exceeds $800-million a year.
While finance minister, Eves also set up an MPP pension plan (which gave him $810,000) only to have it revealed early this year that the plan contravenes federal regulations, an error that will cost taxpayers $10-million.
Then, early in his campaign, Eves initially came out in favour of a two-tier health-care system that would allow the rich to get faster, better care, only to disingenuously backtrack a few days later. Like Flaherty, Eves also supports further tax cuts.
Jim Flaherty is one scary candidate, but Ernie Eves, a tax-cutting, Common Sense Revolutionary passing himself off as a red Tory, is even more dangerous.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.