The guys in the towers

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

It would've been satisfying to be among the G20 protesters led by a guy crying: "When I say bankers, you say -- " And we shout, "Wankers!" Better still, to be the guy. Even so, the pleasure would be limited.

It wouldn't shake up the traders high in the towers watching the protests below while laying bets on the number of arrests -- Bloomberg News quoted a spread of 130 to 140 -- as well as deaths and whether more than 20 people would be hurt in charges by police horses. How do you rattle that kind of complacency? I'll tell you: by having an alternative out there in the real world to their gluttonous, failing, yet still smug capitalist system. Of course they're smug. They're the only option available.

Another model existed during the last global depression, in the 1930s. The Soviet Union was socialist and the bloom wasn't yet off that rose. Visitors from the West often returned with accounts of how well it worked. That shook up enough powerful people to help make the New Deal possible. In Canada in those years, the leader of Canada's Communist Party, Tim Buck, could draw a bigger crowd anywhere than prime minister Mackenzie King.

During later crises, when the Soviet system had ossified and its stench was unavoidable, there were other models: huge China, little Cuba, all the ex-colonies in Africa and Asia with versions of socialism. They weren't just in the heads of Western protesters and dreamers; they were on a map. You could go and see (or project) the dream fulfilled.

How do we know this rattled the guys in the towers? Easy. The endless Western attacks on how unworkable those systems were. Never mind Cuba. Do you know how much space The New York Times filled over the years to frighten readers about Canadian health care? Even Natasha Richardson's sad death was used to scare Americans about "socialized" medicine here.

Most ordinary people can figure out the issues well enough. Economics isn't rocket science. They know unrestricted greed will lead where it just did, again. It takes a dim bulb like Milton Friedman or Alan Greenspan to avoid that simple deduction. The largest protest group at the G20 was based on climate change, which the summit didn't even discuss. They see how huge pensions go to failed CEOs while auto workers must take cuts to their own modest, earned retirement funds. But by the time that kind of insight filters up to enter a communiqué like the G20's yesterday, precious little remains. The guys in the towers can weather almost any degree of common sense with a mixture of denial, mild reform and, above all, patience. They'll even try a dash of socialism now, as long as it doesn't involve any socialists.

No matter how often the economy crashes and shatters, they have no fear of being tried and executed for "economic crimes" -- a rare feature of Soviet communism that one can actually feel nostalgic for. They and their ilk were even cocky enough to resurrect the Doha round of trade talks in that communiqué -- the core of what brought on this catastrophe. They're basically a cheery lot, with even less to trouble them, since the end of the Cold War.

When this horror story began, back in the Reagan-Thatcher era, I saw a man butt into the front of a line at the post office, demand his parcel, and start out. When someone protested, he turned and sneered: "You just don't get it, do you?" Fortunately, many still don't.

On Wednesday, I watched a powerful CBC-TV report about hunger in Africa, much worsened due to the current crisis. Then next morning, I saw the Grade 5 kids in Mr. Eckler's class at Clinton public school arrive in the middle of 20- or 30-hour fasts that they undertook to learn what hunger means.

"This ... is ... hard," breathed one in his 25th hour, weak and a bit disoriented. He got it, but it was a different it.

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.