Here's the real Obama question

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

When Ken Dryden was named MVP after his first Stanley Cup in 1971, at age 23, even before his rookie season, he said he knew that, whatever he did for the rest of his life, he'd already done what he'd be remembered for. The question about Barack Obama is: Does that hold for him, too? It wouldn't be negligible.

He is not just the first black president. He is the first who can't recall where he was when he heard that JFK had been shot - because he was 2! These factoids are linked. He belongs to a demographic - it made his win possible - that doesn't even get the problem with a black, a woman or a gay president. They don't clutch old identifications with race or "the West." They glory in "hybridity" and "mongrelization" - as Barack Obama did when he called himself a "mutt" like the shelter dog he'd prefer for his kids. For another demographic, this shift induces panic. They worry about "shrivelled birth rates" in the United States and its "enervated allies" (Mark Steyn); they mourn the decline of "the last serious Western nation."

No matter, a change has come. It is not a change Barack Obama brings, but one he marks. It already is. "A change is gonna come," sang Sam Cooke in the time of Martin Luther King, more a prayer than a song. That's why Jesse Jackson wept as he stood outside in the crowd on Obama victory night.

This is a politics of emotion and passion - of "bringing the passions back in," as a recent book on politics suggests. It celebrates change, with events such as next Tuesday's inauguration. But there's another kind of change in politics: not marking it but making it. That's what the New Deal of the 1930s did. It's unclear whether Barack Obama will initiate this kind of active change.

During the campaign, he offered few signs of real policy change. On foreign affairs, he said he'd "project" U.S. power, like all presidents. Domestically, he was for the free market and against universal health care. His appointments since the election have been wretchedly conventional, recycling officials not just from the Clinton era but the Bush one, too. Don't worry about change, he assured the worriers, "it comes from me."

On the other hand, there are subtle signs of profound differences. He didn't need to tell that huge audience in Berlin, "We've made our share of mistakes." Especially if he meant it. His speech on race and his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, was personal and brave. Even his recent silence on Gaza differed from the Bush-Harper knee-jerk support for Israeli bombing. It amounted to not quite falling in line. When he and Hillary Clinton finally spoke, they both expressed concern for "Palestinian and Israeli" civilian casualties. In diplo-speak, order counts and will be noted. The normal order is: Concern for Israel comes first.

So will he make real changes? He probably doesn't know himself, says Alexander Cockburn of This, too, is part of the Obama demographic. He reached political maturity just as that old duality, right/left, ceased working as an ideological GPS. The left dissolved and the right strutted a while, then began to vaporize, too, as we've seen. No scripts are currently available.

It made sense that he became a community organizer. It's where you go to feel you can do good, without needing a broader political vision. But it won't help much in enlarged contexts, like the world or the planet. On the other hand, there's his book, the first one, pre-politics. It shows he has a ground-level sense of global realities like no other president: life in Indonesia; raised by a single mother; the ubiquitous roots of violence, rage, humiliation.

Who knows what he'll do? It's a kind of miracle he's there at all. But his book informs us that, beyond his role as symbol, there's someone intriguing at home. The issue is: Will that guy answer the door at the White House?

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.