Media cheerleaders miss story

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

To listen to the media tell it, Canada scored a victory last week at the NATO summit. We got the extra 1,000 troops that the Harper government said were needed to continue our involvement in the Afghan war.

So the fact that we're going to continue to fight in Afghanistan — which most Canadians oppose, according to the polls — has been transformed into a victory. We did it! We got the extra troops for a war Canadians don't want! Bravo!

Actually, the media have confused the Harper government achieving its own objectives with the national interest being advanced.

Yes, the staunchly pro-Washington Harper government cleverly manipulated the weak Liberal opposition into supporting the Afghan military venture, largely by presenting it as an international duty mandated by NATO.

In fact, the countries that make up NATO have no more interest in fighting in Afghanistan than the Canadian public does, which is why the 1,000 extra troops are coming from the United States — the one country that is keen to fight over there.But our media turned the situation into a mini-drama: Would Harper succeed at NATO or wouldn't he? It was easy to lose sight of the real story: The U.S. has succeeded in getting Canada to be its lead partner fighting an unpopular counterinsurgency war in Afghanistan.

In fact, the Harper government has recently made two agreements that have quietly moved us into deeper co-operation with the U.S. military and U.S. foreign policy.

Canada and the U.S. have signed a military agreement, called the Civil Assistance Plan, under which troops can cross the border to help out during an emergency, such as a terrorist attack.

The prospect of U.S. troops in Canada wouldn't sit well with many Canadians, which explains why Ottawa decided not to publicly announce the agreement, signed by U.S. and Canadian generals in Texas on Feb. 14. (The U.S. military issued a press release, however, and Canada followed a week later with an announcement in an internal military publication.)

Commander David Scanlon of Canada Command notes U.S. troops in Canada would be under the "tactical control" of the Canadian military, although they'd remain under the ultimate command of the U.S. government. In other words, Washington would ultimately be in charge of them.

Scanlon insists no U.S. troops would cross into Canada without Canada's permission. But he acknowledged there are some wording differences in the U.S. press release and the Canadian announcement.

This suggests the U.S. might have a different understanding of what the plan permits. There's no way for Canadians to know what it does permit, since the agreement is secret.

In another move that brings Canada closer in line with U.S. policy, the Harper government last month signed a wide-ranging agreement with Israel establishing co-operation in "border management and security" — even though we don't share a border with Israel.

Does this mean Israel will become involved in intelligence gathering about Canadian Muslims or other Canadians supporting Palestinian rights? Does it mean Canada will help Israel with its military operations in the West Bank or Gaza?

It's striking that Canada would sign a security agreement with Israel only months after a Canadian Forces board of inquiry concluded that an Israeli bomb killed a Canadian peacekeeper manning a well-marked UN post during Israel's 2006 invasion of Lebanon.

Given their controversial nature, the Harper government has played down both these recent agreements — and the Canadian media have obliged by ignoring them.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.