These are difficult times for those in the money laundering business. With U.S. President George W. Bushs war on terror in full swing, Washington has been pushing countries around the world to tighten their financial laws to eliminate money laundering as a source of terrorist financing.
In February, the U.S. president made it clear he expects countries to fully co-operate with these sorts of financial changes if they want to avoid ending up on the evil-axis side of his ledger.
One thing absent from his remarks, was any suggestion that such international financial co-operation would be difficult to arrange. When it comes to the war on terrorism, difficult isnt a word I reckon George Bush has in his vocabulary. Hes made it clear he intends to kick ass and hes not taking back-talk from anyone.
Its interesting to see how quickly this tall-in-the-saddle resolve about remodeling the world wilts away when it comes to enforcing international co-operation on things that would actually make the world a better place.
When it comes to goals like reducing international financial instability and fighting world poverty, for instance, the problems of lining up international financial co-operation are deemed insurmountable.
Take the Tobin tax, for instance. Its a proposed tax aimed at curbing the highly-destructive practice of currency speculation which banks and investment firms carry out daily on a massive, world-wide scale.
Ever since it was first proposed back in 1972 by James Tobin - the Nobel Prize-winning economist who died last month - the Tobin tax has provoked intense hostility from those in the banking and investment community who have profited enormously from the lucrative game of betting on the ups and downs of national currencies.
The resistance of these bankers and financiers is understandable, since the whole purpose of the tax is to put these guys out of business when it comes to currency speculation.
By making currency speculation unprofitable, the tax would help protect the world from the bouts of financial instability that have rocked Mexico, Southeast Asia, Russia, Brazil and Argentina in the last decade, with secondary shocks felt around the world.
At the same time, the Tobin tax would raise billions of dollars annually that could be put towards fighting world poverty. (Now if only the Tobin tax could do something really useful, like remove unwanted hair, maybe it would get some attention.)
So its not surprising that bankers and brokers resist the tax. Its also not surprising that they try to dismiss it as simply unfeasible.
That way, they avoid being in the awkward position of having to explain why the world economy should be allowed to operate much like a giant gambling casino.
Instead, they can say that the Tobin tax may be a fine idea but it just won t work, that theres no way countries around the world could be convinced to collect the tax, since capital would simply move to another jurisdiction.
This notion that socially-desirable goals are simply unattainable in the highly-mobile world of the global economy, amounts to what I like to call a cult of impotence. Any policy that business doesnt like is quickly rejected as impossible to achieve, given the realities of the global economy.
Whats striking, though, as George W. Bush illustrates, is how quickly all this impotence disappears, how quickly apparently incapacitated men spring back to full vigour, when the cause is something like stopping terrorist financing, rather than merely ensuring that hundreds of millions of people get enough food to survive.
Another line of argument against the Tobin tax is that it wont work because financiers will simply figure out some clever way to avoid it. (Its interesting to note that George Bush isnt deterred by the possibility that terrorists will find clever new ways to launder money.)
In fact, nobody expects the Tobin tax to be a cure-all.
Economist Rudi Dornbusch once argued that the tax would not eliminate all currency speculation, but would help deter it, just as gun control would not stop all murder; poison and knives would make a comeback. Still, sensible people support gun control as a useful tool for curbing violence.
Despite the hostility of the financial community and the financial press, the Tobin tax has been quietly gaining supporters over the past thirty years. Interestingly, the Canadian Parliament was the first elected legislature in the world to support it, back in 1999, when a substantial majority of Members of Parliament voted in favour of a private members motion introduced by the New Democratic Partys Lorne Nystrom.
Since then, the tax has been endorsed by Frances National Assembly, and is under consideration in a number of other European Union countries. British Chancellor Gordon Brown recently pointed to the tax as a possible new source of funding for global development. Last month, the German Ministry for Development produced a report saying the tax is feasible.
Sadly, though, attempts to keep the Tobin tax on the agenda at the recent United Nations conference on world development in Monterrey, Mexico were scuttled by the U.S.
So, except for terrorism, impotence reigns in Washington.
George W. Bush may be the Clint Eastwood of terrorist-fighting, but when it comes to standing up to world poverty, he could learn a thing or two from those Bob Dole commercials.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.