Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who prides himself on being an economist, has characterized his government’s fiscal policy as “expansionary.”
If he really thinks the simple fact of running a budget deficit is “expansionary”, he should repeat Economics 101.
The correct way to look at the question of whether fiscal policy is expansionary or contractionary is not to look at the budget balance in isolation, but to look at the year to year change in the cyclically adjusted budget balance as a share of GDP – i.e., the change in the budget balance (surplus or deficit) which can be attributed to discretionary actions on the spending and tax side rather than to changes in the underlying economy. Economists also look at the cyclically adjusted primary balance — which excludes changes in debt servicing costs — and at the cyclically adjusted budget balance as a share of potential GDP.
Estimates of these balances looking backwards are published in the Department of Finance Fiscal Monitor. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, the Government of Canada does not provide estimates for the current year, or projections. However, the IMF currently estimate that the total Canadian structural budget balance will fall by more than $14 billion or by 1 per cent of GDP in 2011 compared to 2010. This is the result of both federal and provincial actions.
The 2011 federal budget projections (Table 5.7) show that the federal budgetary balance will narrow by 0.3 per cent of GDP this year (from -2.2 per cent to -1.9 per cent) compared to last. While this is partly driven by a very modest cyclical recovery in tax revenues, the main factor is a fall in federal program spending of 0.3 per cent of GDP, from 14.8 per cent of GDP to 14.5 per cent of GDP. The budget itself (p.195) states that “the expiration of stimulus measures and the savings measures announced in the budget are expected to lower the ratio of program spending to GDP from 16.0% in 2009-10 to 12.9% in 2015-16.”
In short, the federal government is deliberately cutting spending, which will lower GDP. While there is still a small deficit, fiscal policy cannot be described as “expansionary.”
This article was first posted on The Progressive Economics Forum.
We’re so glad you stopped by!
Thanks for consuming rabble content this year.
rabble.ca is 100% reader and donor funded, so as an avid reader of our content, we hope you will consider gifting rabble with a donation today!
Whether it be a one-time donation or a small monthly contribution, your support is critical to keep rabble writers producing the work you’ve come to rely on as a part of a healthy media diet.