Vancouver's Grandview-Woodland urban development plan: Whose options are really on the table?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a supporting member of

In conjunction with what seems to be the year of the developer, the recently drafted Grandview-Woodland Community plan brings a new take on density to Vancouver's Broadway and Commercial neighbourhood.

When the City of Vancouver organized a workshop on July 6 titled "Exploring Options for a Transit Oriented Community," it was a response to the concern of residents around the tentative height of tower buildings and highrises outlined in the "Emerging Directions" development plan, released in June.

Though community planner Andrew Pask emphasized that the city will not proceed with the current propositions for the Commercial-Broadway area, the focus of the half-day workshop was less about the deeper questions surrounding the proposal, and more about the structure of development.

When participants were asked to express their hopes and fears around the Grandview-Woodland plan for Commercial and Broadway, many expressed concern that forgone conclusions had been established and that the workshop would merely pay lip service to assertions of dissent.

As people gathered into breakout tables, using blocks to organize their own personal ideas for accommodating higher density, the process allowed little room to talk about methods for avoiding displacement and gentrification. In addition, limitations and lack of promotion meant the event was not sufficiently inclusive and did not reflect the diversity of residents on Commercial Drive.

Which leaves one wondering: whose options are truly on the table?

Tania Ehret is a contributing editor with

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.