Northern Gateway Pipeline gets go-ahead

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

The National Energy Board ruled to approve the controversial Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline today at a media lock-up event in Calgary. The pipeline was approved with 209 conditions.

The 1,177-kilometre pipeline would bring tar sands bitumen from Alberta to Kitimat, BC, for shipment to Asian and U.S. markets. It has been fiercely opposed by Northern BC residents and a coalition of over 130 First Nations.

Legal action and protests forthcoming: Grand Chief

"It will trigger a nasty backlash," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, who viewed the decision as "the death of the integrity with respect to the JRP and environmental review processes in the country."

"There will be a multitude of lawsuits, protests, demonstrations, marches and at the end, if the company goes for site preparation, people will be physically out there confronting bulldozers."

Although the decision has shocked the large number of BC residents who opposed Enbridge's proposal, many suspected that the NEB would approve it after the federal oversight group announced that it would make the decision in Calgary.

"We know that this whole JRP process has been undemocratic. As you uncovered regarding NEB coordinating spying on ordinary citizens who are participating in the democratic discussions and making their voice heard, we've known that they're siding with industry on this," said North Coast MLA Jen Rice, who represents constituents in Prince Rupert. 

"What this shows is that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is autocratic," she said, noting that many in Northern BC were against the project. 

At the federal level, NDP and Green party strongly criticized the decision. 

"We have been very clear: New Democrats stand with British Columbians and oppose the Northern Gateway project because it puts our jobs and our BC coastline at risk," NDP environment critic Peter Julien said. "This pipeline would threaten existing industries, and even a modest spill will contaminate this pristine coastline for decades—ravaging tourism and the salmon fishery. The risks are simply unacceptable."

"I'd like to know the economic analysis of the Northern Gateway project, which no one has done," federal Green leader Elizabeth May said. "The logic of shipping dilutent from the BC coast to Alberta, to then add it to raw crude, only to ship back to the coast doesn't make sense."

Doubts over safety and accountability

The project was broadly opposed throughout BC during the Joint Review Panel hearings. Of over 1,000 speakers who presented at the hearings, only a small handful spoke in support of the projects. Some communities near the pipeline route, such as Smithers and Burns Lake expressed 100 per cent opposition to the project, with mayors speaking out strongly against the project.

BC Premier Christy Clark went as far as to reject the project in May, saying that Enbridge did not fulfill the requirements needed to operate in British Columbia. She also warned last October that BC was "unprepared" to deal with an oil tanker spill off the coast.  

This article originally appeared on Vancouver Observer and is reprinted with permission. Support the Vancouver Observer's Tar Sands Coverage Kickstarter Campaign here.


Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.