Government finally responds (sort of) to MMIWG inquiry

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support for as little as $5 per month!

Large crowd of protesters on the streets of Toronto. A red dress and Mohawk Warrior flag can be seen hoisted above the crowd. May 30, 2020, by Louis Karoniaktajeh Hall.

As the country has been absorbing the proof of our genocidal behaviour toward Indigenous children after the discovery of an unmarked mass grave at a former residential school in Kamloops, the federal government belatedly released its response to the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG), which completed its work two years ago.

The federal response is in the form of a "pathway," not a fixed plan. It could change with time. To start with, the federal Liberals have pledged $2.2 billion over five years to the task.

Many of the actions the federal government announced relate specifically to gender and to the way the justice system operates. Those include increasing the number of shelters for Indigenous women and expanding First-Nations-controlled policing.

But the federal response also recognizes the broader, systemic context.

Abuses of any segments of the Indigenous population cannot be separated from a centuries-long legacy of exploitation. Ever since the first European settlers came to this continent, we have single-mindedly sought to exploit its natural resources while pushing the Indigenous peoples aside.

The federal government's MMIWG inquiry action plan puts it this way:

"Restoring, respecting, upholding and promoting self-determination of Indigenous Peoples, which will support the process of decolonization and the development and implementation of Indigenous-led solutions and services."

Among the issues the federal government promises to address are: poverty, adequate and safe housing, political repression, and denial of cultural practices.

The actual commitments are a grab bag of previously announced initiatives, tweaks to existing programs, and some new specific programs -- such as a national hotline for Indigenous women and girls.

And then there are a few mere promises, for which there are neither action plans nor dollars committed.

In the last category is a pledge to address poverty, Indigenous and otherwise, via a guaranteed annual livable income. The $2.2 billion Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced on Thursday, June 3 does not come close to paying for that promise.

A commitment to any kind of Indigenous sovereignty, however, is conspicuously missing.

A land base, control and ownership of natural resources such as oil and gas, and institutions of self-government have been fundamental demands of Indigenous peoples seeking sovereignty for many decades.

In frontier areas of the north, the demand means recognizing Indigenous sovereignty over broad swaths of territory (currently recognized as Crown land) and resources that extend far beyond the tiny patches of land assigned to reserves.

In the populated south, Indigenous people express this demand through the Land Back movement, which seeks to acquire land from private owners and return it to Indigenous communities.

Instead, the current government only offers vague talk about enhancing the economic benefits Indigenous communities derive from resource extraction activity.

In a telling passage in its response to the MMIWG Inquiry, the Trudeau government acknowledges the need to "support safe communities during resource extraction." It references "many resource extraction projects" and specifically names the Trans Mountain Project Expansion.  

In a rare display of candour, the government admits that it must do more "to ensure the safety and security of Indigenous women, girls and 2SLGBTQQIA+ people at all stages of major resource projects."

It is a short and fairly vague statement in long document, but it tells a big story.

The government acknowledges here that Indigenous communities get little economic benefit from major projects -- given a system where all resource royalties go to provincial governments, or, in rare cases, the federal government.

Further, the government also recognizes these mega-projects can have a socially devastating impact on vulnerable Indigenous peoples.

Here's the rub, though: the government announces zero tangible actions in this part of its response to the Missing and Murdered Women and Girls Inquiry.

All we have is a pledge to look at a "variety of activities aimed at mitigating impacts of temporary work camps and worker influxes."

Don't forget that word: "mitigating." Our society has no intention of recognizing any measure of Indigenous peoples' rightful ownership and control of their lands and resources.

Rather, we intend to continue the centuries-old practice of treating Indigenous communities as inconveniences for businesses that seek to make profits from the riches on their territories. 

The only departure with tradition is that we plan to do something -- don't know what yet -- to "mitigate" (translation: make less terrible) the harms our society's and, especially, our corporations' intrusions might visit on First Nations.

Is that a cause for rejoicing?

Karl Nerenberg has been a journalist and filmmaker for more than 25 years. He is rabble's politics reporter.

Image credit: Louis Karoniaktajeh Hall​/Flickr.

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.